Clarence and Ginni Thomas |
On July 1, 1991 President George Bush nominated Clarence Thomas to replace Thurgood Marshall on the Supreme Court. Thomas was confirmed despite allegations of sexual harassment from Attorney Anita Hill, a woman many even in the Black community simply didn't want to believe.
Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas in 1991 |
Hill has devoted the ensuing 33 years since advocating to protect women from the conduct of which she alleged Clarence Thomas engaged.
In all venues, it's simply illegal for a sitting judge to accept monies from a constituent, but, in that respect Justice Thomas and his wife Ginni have proven time and again to be without ethics or morals, grifters, as it were.
The Thomas's Billionaire Benefactor Harlan Crow |
Billionaire Harlan Crow himself has totally corrupted Clarence and Ginni, gifting them 32 luxury vacations, private jet and yacht transportation, literally hundreds of thousands of dollars, not to mention a "forgiven" $267,000 loan for a motor coach, payment of rent for Harlan's mother, $6,000 per month for school tuition for Clarence and Ginni's adopted son and on and on. . . . .
Then, there's the 501(c)(3) non-profit Judicial Education Committee that footed the bill for one of Ginni's pet projects even paying Kellyanne Conway's salary with Liberty Consulting as reported by the Washington Post.
Justice Clarence Thomas with Donated Motorhome |
Yes, the Thomas's are unabashed grifters, not satisfied with sucking on the public teat for the $285,400 Supreme Court Justice salary, but unethically, dishonestly milking conservative contributors for hundreds of thousands of dollars annually.
So, if I read this right, you are saying Harlan (Crow, I presume) paid for his mother's rent. What is wrong with that? The real bombshell here is that Harlan and Ginni adopted a son together. That relationship is a lot cozier then I thought but under those circumstances don't you think it appropriate that he pay the child's school tuition? (You may want to do a little editing for clarity. I know what you meant but that isnt what you said)
ReplyDeleteGood catch
ReplyDelete