 |
| SpaceX Headquarters, Hawthorne, CA |
SpaceX's gross violations of a Memorandum of Agreement, dated 9/1/2013 and signed by five governmental agencies and the Space Exploration Technologies Corporation in late 2014 and early 2015, will be an issue in upcoming Cameron County Judge's race.
Carlos Cascos, hinting that he could file for County Judge "after Labor Day," stated recently his feeling that Cameron County has not enforced the agreement with SpaceX:
"I have been suggesting for quite some time that I believed the contract that I entered into with SpaceX was not being adhered to. The County has been aware of these issues & have failed to enforce the contract. It is my understanding there are no amendments to the contract. Thank you to "Save RGV" & DA Luis Saenz for bringing this to the forefront."
Please find a link to the 30 page memorandum below:
 |
| Bill Berg and John Young of Save RGV |
It was Berg's letter to District Attorney Saenz and County Judge Trevino detailing Spacex's violations of the memorandum agreement that resulted in DA Saenz threat of prosecuting the SpaceX Corporation.
Here's a few things I noted while perusing the memorandum:
SpaceX is limited to 12 launches per year while closing the beach for a maximum of 180 hours per year. That averages out to 15 hours of beach closing per month.
The corporation has consistently been in gross violation.
The memorandum clearly states:
“Anything not otherwise specifically addressed in this Agreement is not authorized or otherwise approved by this Agreement.
Yet, Spacex sneakily got the Federal Aviation Agency to double the hours of beach closure to 300 per year.
Without the signatures of the other government agencies who signed the original memorandum, the new beach closing agreement is bogus, unlawful.
Yet, arrogantly, Spacex violated the new bogus agreement by logging 585 hours of beach closing in the first 5 months of 2021, that is an average of 117 per month or 7.8 times the number of beach closing hours allowed in the memorandum.
The agreement requires SpaceX to establish a ground water well at the launch area to "minimize water truck traffic" on Highway 4. Nothing in documents I read indicates this well was established, although I'm open to correction if wrong.
Other requirements include vibration monitoring and historical signage requirements.
Birdwatchers, naturalists, wildlife census-takers are supposed to be given access to the wildlife refuge area.
Beach closing are not to be total, but to be "mitigated," that is, an alternate beach area provided.
Below find a cut and paste of Bill Berg's letter to DA Saenz and County Judge Trevino:
Luis V. Saenz, Cameron County District Attorney Eddie Trevino, Jr. Cameron County Judge
1100 E. Monroe St. Brownsville, Texas 78520
Re: Contract No. 2013CO853 and GLO Contract No. 13-447-000-7916 of Memorandum of Agreement dated September 1, 2013
Dear District Attorney Saenz and Judge Trevino,
This letter is on behalf of Save RGV, a Texas non-profit organization, part of whose mission is to promote the conservation of the remaining natural areas of eastern Cameron County.
We want to call to your attention the multiple and egregious violations of the 9/1/13 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between Cameron County and the General Land Office.
That MOA details the conditions whereby the public is to be denied access to Boca Chica beach to benefit the activities of a private corporation, SpaceX.
Among the violations of the MOA are the following.
1. Closures of State Highway 4, which is the only ingress and egress to Boca Chica beach, have not been done with proper notice.
The MOA states, “Each request will be considered “timely” if submitted to the county, with a copy to the GLO, at least 14 days prior to the earliest proposed Primary or Back-up Closure Date.”
In actuality, the 14-day requirement is ignored and the closure hours are often changed, canceled, or added to/subtracted from, with barely a few hours’ notice, and sometimes with no notice at all.
2. Frequently the County’s published hours of closure orders are changed (reduced or extended) by SpaceX, essentially closing a state highway without state or county authorization. This is illegal.
3. The MOA requires that closure announcements be accompanied by a “beach mitigation plan.” We have never seen such a plan. Nor have we seen the MOA-specified documents stating “identify areas where alternative public beach access will be available…” We are requesting copies of these documents.
4. The MOA acknowledges the county’s right to close access to the public beach for “emergencies related to public safety.”
SpaceX is a private business, not an emergency.
Furthermore the MOA states the County’s requirement in “preserving the public right of access to the public beach” but in fact it has been taking that right away.
Not just beach-goers are affected; access is also being denied to state park (Brazos Island State
Boca Chica Beach Closures
p 2
Park & Boca Chica State Park) visitors and staff, federal wildlife refuge visitors and staff (Boca Chica Unit of the Lower Rio Grande Valley NWR), scientists doing wildlife census and survey work, birdwatchers and naturalists, and visitors to Palmito Ranch National Battlefield Site.
The Texas State Constitution, Article 1, Bill of Rights, Section 3, Section 17(b), Section 19 and Section 33(d) are being violated. Further, the Texas Open Beaches Act, passed in 1959, assures that the public has the “free and unrestricted right of ingress and egress to and from” public beaches, defined as the area between the line of vegetation and the mean low tide line.
It also prohibits the construction of an “obstruction, barrier, or restraint of any nature which would interfere with the free and unrestricted right of the public” to access the beach.
5. SpaceX security personnel have denied public access to Remedios Avenue and Joanna Street, county roads off SH 4.
In the absence of the county officially and legally relinquishing this road to a private company by a process that would require public comment and a documented county commission vote, such access denial is clearly illegal.
6. The closure hours in 2020 and 2021 exceed the number of hours allowed in the FAA’s 2014 Record of Decision(ROD), which is referenced as follows in the MOA between the GLO and the County: “The number of Space Flight Cycles is limited to the number of launches permitted under a Record of Decision issued by the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation.”
That ROD (attached) limits the number of Cycles to 12 per year and the closure hours to 180 per year.
We understand the County and the General Land Office have not amended the MOA.
The MOA states that “Anything not otherwise specifically addressed in this Agreement is not authorized or otherwise approved by this Agreement.
No amendment, change, or modification to this Agreement may be made except in a formal written amendment signed by both Parties to the Agreement.”
As the MOA specifically refers to the ROD and not any subsequent FAA Reevaluation, how can the County authorize over 180 hours of closures per year without a formal written amendment to the MOA?
7. These closures by the County and the GLO may be in violation of the Public Trust Doctrine that specifically and strongly supports the State protecting natural resources and public land access.
It clearly states that all natural resources (open bodies of water, wildlife, air, and tidelands) belong to all and must be protected by governments and agencies put “in trust” of those resources belonging to the public, and therefore must be managed and protected in perpetuity by the government.
8. While not reflected in any revision of the MOA, the FAA did issue a Written Reevaluation on 12-2-20 that increased the allowed closure hours to 300 hours per year.
The attached closure log, documented by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the Coastal Bend Bay & Estuary Program, not only shows that closures have already exceed 300 hours in less than 5 months, but that the actual closure hours (385) have exceeded the County-published closure announcements by 50 hours (335).
There appears to be no attempt whatsoever by either Cameron County or the GLO to abide by or enforce the closure limits.
Boca Chica Beach Closures
p 3
Since SpaceX has already exceeded its FAA-authorized 300 hour closure limit for 2021, we ask Cameron County and the GLO to cease issuing any further closure orders for the rest of this year. To do otherwise is to continue to knowingly and willingly violate the Memorandum of Agreement.
Sincerely, Bill Berg, Agent, Save RGV
CC: Daniel Lopez, Cameron County Litigation Counselor Jeff Gordon, Office of the General Counsel, GLO David Land, Office of the General Counsel, GLO Becky Petty, Office of the General Counsel, GLO Natalie Bell, Beach Access & Dune Protection, GLO Kendal Keyes, TPWD Ted Hollingsworth, TPWD Kelly McDowell, USFWS Sonny Perez, USFWS Bryan Winton, USFWS Dawn Gardiner, USFWS Maria Martinez, EPA Cheryl Stevens Perales, Allmon & Ice, P.C
What do they really want to shut up and go away? I guess they want to shake the money tree? These people are virtue pandering for gold.
ReplyDelete