Hasse Defends Trump on El Rrun Rrun

From the editor:  Donald J. Trump, with the lowest approval rating of a newly-elected president in history, has been roundly criticized in the media and brought at least two noted comedians out of retirement.  His tweets and public statements have been brash and frequently nonfactual.  

Local conservative, Tad Hasse, a City of Brownsville administrator, recently defended Trump in an article published in El Rrun Rrun blog.  We repost Tad's statement below:



"He wasn't in line with the party, which tried to

Tad Hasse

stop him, which means that his rise was solely based on popular, grassroots support."

True, now please roll that statement around for a while in that leftist organ that keeps your ears apart. Don't type yet, you'll just dig the hole deeper because we are not done. Now that you can't believe that those were your own words from your own fingertips and not taken out of context in any way, I want you to put that statement into the factual context of a democratic republic, which the United States is. You notice that light that is too bright to stare into?

"His signature hairstyle took a backseat to the constant and blatant falsehoods, his clear contempt for minorities, the goading of his supporters into violently assailing black people at his rallies, even those who were there to support him, and of course, the theme of his coming out party: his insulting, inhumane, and factless characterization of Mexican immigrants and Mexican culture. Of Muslim immigrants and their cultures."

Did he tell a bunch of whoppers?
Sure.


He spoke a lot of truth as well, but then again, so did you; without so much of the truth part, in some not so insidious ways I might add. The man who is now President (get used to it) did not express contempt for minorities. He expressed anger at illegal aliens. He expressed anger at people who did not come to America to be Americans, but to make this country into their country of origin. The ones doing any goading to violence at his rallies were Democratic Party paid provocateurs.


That is proven fact. Black people? You really need to listen to a few, maybe Diamond and Silk, Sheriff David A. Clark, and host of others. If you want to accuse them of Uncle Tom backstabbing of their race, then get ready to have your ears burnt off, and they can be far more direct than I. The Democrat plantation isn’t working anymore. Poverty pimping will not be tolerated. Get used to that as well.

“Also, and vastly more disruptive, cruel, and unconstitutional, he has restricted entrance to the country from people of 7 specific countries, including Syria, which is going through a holocaust where precious, beautiful children have seen and suffered unimaginable horrors. This ban is extended to people who already have green cards or permanent residentship status, who have lived and worked legally in the States for years.”
Disruptive to who?


Your claim of unconstitutional is a lie, straight up and bald faced. Those Syrian immigrants are sure working out well for France, Belgium, Germany, Sweden, etc. as are those from the other countries on the list now aren’t they? If it isn’t working there, why in the hell would anyone think it would work any better here? Would you like pictures of those people that the nation wants excluded? Maybe a few beheading, a couple of crucifixions, maybe a couple of female genital mutilations? A rape photo or two? The ban was modified to exclude those classes that you just stated that it was extended to encompass. So that is a blatant lie.
The reasoning behind this ban, which has immediately turned into a crises of multiple natures, is allegedly protecting the US from Islamic terrorism. This creates quite a bit of cognitive dissonance for me, knowing that the biggest bank roller of terrorist groups is Saudi Arabia, which is NOT included on the list, and curiously, has not faced any type of intervention by previous administrations. There are private business relationships that are not to be disrupted between the two countries, even if it means overlooking the massive quantity of extremism it produces.”

The biggest bankrollers of Hillary Clinton, which makes it not so curious and should cure your cognitive dissonance (the new “gravitas” of the current political discussion climate) and also explains the lack of intervention by our previous Muslim in Chief.

“Another disturbing fact: the American police murders an average of 1,200 American citizens a year. If Trump had the safety of its citizens as a priority, he would be focusing on these more immediate threats. The fact that he is not, reveals that these executive orders are purely based on xenophobia, nationalism, and racism.”
More of the BLM absolute bullshit. Murders? Lets just continue Obama’s war on our police. Trump obviously has the safety of his citizens as a priority and there is absolutely nothing wrong with nationalism, unless you don’t want a nation. By the way, your race card account was severely overdrawn over the last few years and has been canceled.

“Lastly, I am here to make a case for the underrated and forgotten tradition of direct action, such as strikes, boycotts, and protests. Democracy is not limited to electoral politics. In fact the biggest social advancements have been achieved by acts of civil disobedience, not through the ballot box. Taking to the streets is also democracy, even more so than voting is.”
So since all but a very small part of that bunch of vitreous sounding bilge has been proven to be just that, what more than whining is to be accomplished by your rally? It is more of Divider in Chief’s playbook that America rejected. You can cut out the crap now, I am done.