Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
𝗜𝗦 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 "𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗢𝗨𝗦" 𝗔𝗕𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔𝗡 𝗔𝗗𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗢𝗥 𝗦𝗜𝗠𝗣𝗟𝗬 𝗧𝗥𝗬𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗢 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗢𝗟𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗣𝗢𝗪𝗘𝗥 𝗔𝗦 𝗔 𝗗𝗜𝗖𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥?
January 20th will be a sad, sad day, not for me, but for our country, as an incompetent egomaniac, once again, is sworn in to hold our natio...
.png)
-
Dr. Lorenzo Pelly M.D., Lic. No. G2453, Brownsville On August 20, 2021. The Board and Lorenzo Pelly, M.D., 2012 Valley Baptist Physician ... -
.png)
photos courtesy of Jerry Danache Driving toward Mexico Boulevard at about 12:50 PM on New Years Day , it occurred to me that the Eddie Garci... -
HTML Source Code: Leo Quarterback from Leo Rosales on Vimeo .
Mark Sossi was hired by the City Commission to be a "Yes" man when asked about the legality of actions by Tony Martinez and United Brownsville. Sossi's job depends on him finding a "legal way" or "legal justification" to support whatever this commission of idiots wants to do. Tony Martinez wants no challenges to his ideas and Sossi is paid the big bucks to find ways to say "yes" to Tony and his "ventures".
ReplyDeleteEven if it is legal, the elected officials have a moral, fiduciary, and trust standard that the decisions being made are not based on a personal agenda, but is the city agenda and representation of the people they serve. In this instance, as in the R.E. Smity property give away, Jacob Brown give way, Cueto Building, Casa Nylon, renting offices to be empty, funding personal agenda programs for a select few, entering into very costly deals like a power plant for almost twice the cost per megawatt, when we have real needs to make the city progressive and better community-the Lincoln Park give away to one of the richest universities in the world is a travesty to principle of government that is suppose to be of, for, and by the people. The Lincoln Park issue is the same as the Event Center issue back in 1990, which called and we forced the commission to put the issue up to a referendum. At that time, the voters spoke against the personal agenda by some property owners in the Amigoland area and voted for an event center to the north, which has turned out to have been the right choice as proven by time. The Lincoln Park issue is exactly the same and it should be put to a referendum. Brownsville cannot continue to give away its's assets or discount them to bottom dollar to please a select few. The UTB/TSC merger was a mistake and now to allow UTB to go to Hidalgo was also a mistake and we will always be the last rung on the ladder politically and in the priorities of the UT system. The city with the highest poverty rate is the one they bleed.
ReplyDeleteSo?
DeleteUgh! Gross!!
ReplyDeleteSausekig!
ReplyDeleteI look at it this way if there hell bent on selling the park, regardless of what the college does with the land make the uckers pay for it stop giving shit away.Pat is right get a legitimate appraisal on the park and then maybe,oh by the way no new park at shitsville.
ReplyDeleteit will be legal to sell the park. It will not be legal to build another one. it will be legal to move the money to bike trails.
ReplyDeleteNina was kind to him. Please draw a picture of him when he walked in on his wife fucking another dude.
ReplyDelete