El Rrun Rrun Tantalizes with Vague Report of Possible Serious Crime

From the editor:  In a story that might have found itself on the cutting room floor of high school journalism classes across the country for want of the "who, what, where and how" usually critical to news stories as opposed to the "what if?" and "could have" the account utilized, Juan Montoya of the "El Rrun Rrun" blog, presented an account that raised more questions than it answered.   With the foundation of "word has spread" Juan reported the disturbing three hour long sexual assault of a BISD bus driver.  But, as Juan wove the story, he inserted conflict, at first stating that the victim told law enforcement that her attacker had been paid to assault her, then supplementing that with "we find" that law enforcement types frequently attribute such a report to a "relationship gone sour."  

Juan Montoya

The victim's "acquaintances,"  Juan adds, have suggested "other factors working here," including  "acute embarrassment at a relationship and tryst gone bad, or some other purely personal motive."

What is Juan insinuating?  Is this story a preemptive strike for a politico who anticipates a forthcoming, actual news story?  Sometimes the story behind the story is worth telling.  The field of subsidized "news" stories is filled with hazards, but no one negotiates that field better than Montoya.  

The story Juan runs with eerily resembles one that I heard last night, but could not verify.  This "fledgling newshound," as Juan described me a couple days ago, simply could not run this story as presented.  Below is the "El Rrun Rrun" account, warts and all:


Was There or Wasn't There an Assault for Pay?

By Juan Montoya
By now the word has spread throughout the city and the Brownsville Independent School District that a female bus driver reported to the Cameron County Sheriff's Department that she was physically and sexually assaulted over the course of about three hours at her apartment Sunday night before the aggressor left.
But apparently, she also told deputies that before the attacker left, he told her that someone had paid him to assault her and "very well."
We, of course, have no way of knowing whether that is exactly what happened, but the suspicion that someone had paid the attacker money to inflict the horrendous act upon ny woman would be cause enought o recoil at the crime.
To think that there was a political motive for the attack is nothing short of heinous.
But now we find that some law enforcement types have expressed some skepticism about the woman's report and say that frequently in some cases where the victim and attacker have a standing relationship that goes sour, reports like these are often the result.
As we said, we have no way of knowing what actually happened. Lest someone criticize us for doubting the woman's story, let us say out front that we condemn the crime – if it actually occurred – in the strongest terms.
But in speaking with acquaintacnes of the complaintant, we are led to think that there may be other factors working here. Perhaps the complaint was the result of acute embarrassment at a relationship and tryst gone bad, or some other purely personal motive. Or perhaps the evening degenerated into something not envisioned by either actor in the occurrence.
If indeed the sexual and physical assault did transgress over the span of three hours, then we're sure that the investigators will have plenty of evidence left over at the scene to determine the identity, if not the motives, of the assailant.
In either case, an assault is nothing we wish upon anybody, sexual or otherwise. Hopefully, the county investigators will get to the bottom of this to dispel any suspicion that a political motivation drove the alleged attack.