Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
𝐂𝐈𝐓𝐘'𝐒 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐋𝐓𝐇 𝐃𝐄𝐏𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐌𝐎𝐓𝐄𝐒 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐋𝐓𝐇𝐘 𝐃𝐈𝐄𝐓 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐔𝐆𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐒𝐈 𝐋𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐑𝐎 𝐅𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐕𝐀𝐋 𝐀𝐓 𝐁𝐑𝐎𝐖𝐍𝐒𝐕𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐄 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐒 𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐄𝐓 𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐂𝐇 𝟐𝟏
Arturo Rodriguez Health Department Director Longtime director of the City of Brownsville's Health Department, Arturo Rodriguez, continue...
.jpeg)
-
Dr. Lorenzo Pelly M.D., Lic. No. G2453, Brownsville On August 20, 2021. The Board and Lorenzo Pelly, M.D., 2012 Valley Baptist Physician ... -
Fired RGV Sector Border Patrol Chief Gloria Chavez, pictures from social events with Uni-Trade CEO Eduardo Garza and Tequila maker Francisco... -
.png)
photos courtesy of Jerry Danache Driving toward Mexico Boulevard at about 12:50 PM on New Years Day , it occurred to me that the Eddie Garci...
I’ve heard Special Guest Speaker is one hell of a get. Who hasn’t heard of Special Guest Speaker?
ReplyDeleteAnother novice for "change". zzzzzzzzzzzzz
ReplyDeleteSay the Sucio Lucio's. Scared? Eddie Lucio doesn't represent this area, he only represents the Republicans he sells out to. ANYONE would do a better job.
DeleteCan she cook?
ReplyDeleteA topic to ask Erasmo and Jessica on Sunday
ReplyDeletehttps://rrunrrun.blogspot.com/2019/07/so-if-tetreau-blocks-you-from-facebook.html
TUESDAY, JULY 9, 2019
IF TETREAU, ERASMO BLOCK YOU ON FACEBOOK, IS IT LEGAL?
By Ronn Blitzer
Fox News
A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that President Trump is not allowed to block people on Twitter over statements he does not like, affirming a lower court’s decision that declared the president’s account a “public forum.”
In a Tuesday decision, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals noted that because Trump uses Twitter to communicate with the public about his administration, and his account is open to the public for people to comment on his posts, it warrants constitutional free speech protection under the First Amendment.
“We do conclude,” the opinion said, “that the First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise‐open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees.”
According to court documents, Trump admitted that he blocked the plaintiffs in the case in 2017 after they posted tweets that “criticized him or his policies.” Once they were blocked, they were no longer able to view Trump’s tweets while logged in, and no longer had access to reply to tweets or view comment threads on Trump’s Twitter page.
The First Amendment prohibits government discrimination against a person’s free speech based on their viewpoint. Trump claimed that his Twitter account is private, so the First Amendment should not apply.
The court said that Trump’s account was indeed private before he became president, but that changed once he took office and used it for official business, as it now displays “all the trappings of an official, state‐run account." The court said that once Trump leaves office, his account will be considered private again.
POSTED BY JMON AT 11:43 AM
Ask election legal expert Roman Perez. He'll get DeCoss to file charges with the DA
ReplyDelete