Sunday, January 21, 2018

Coast Guard Approves Rio Grande LNG Export Site at Brownsville, Says Space X’s nearby Spaceport Can Co-Exist

From LNG World News

The United States Coast Guard (USCG) approved the Rio Grande LNG project’s waterway sustainability assessment (WSA) declaring the project suitable for LNG marine traffic. The project was declared suitable for accommodating the type and the frequency of LNG marine traffic, the USCG filing says.

This recommendation is provided to assist in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s determination of whether the proposed facility should be authorized.

The review also notes that the Space X Speceport’s launch site, which is 5 miles away from the proposed LNG facility, could co-exist, as the risk of public impact from a projectile in the 10,000 to 100,000 ft-lb range would be just inside the tolerable region.

NextDecade, a company focused on LNG exports, developing the project said in November it could reach a final investment decision for as few as two trains with a 9 mtpa production capacity.

At full build-out, the facility in the Port of Brownsville would have the capacity to produce 27 million tons of liquefied natural gas per year out of 6 production trains. The project is currently going through the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) process, with NextDecade expecting to receive a notice of schedule in the near future. A final authorization is expected in the second half of 2018.

9 comments:

  1. That is awesome! I wish I was around your cry baby friends at save the rgv from LNG right now. I am sick of those old retirees spreading lies. Go back to minnesota or where ever the hell you came from. You are to old to work anyway but have time to sit around and spread bullshit. The LNG business is booming. DONE DEAL, as we like to say. Thanks for the great news today jimmy boy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cry baby, cry baby, stick your finger in your own eye.

      For the record, I was born in Fort Worth, TX; grew up and lived in Austin, TX, until moving to the RGV in 1995; and have never set foot in Minnesota or in Hell.

      The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has remaining questions for NextDecade about the risks and hazards posed to its proposed Rio Grande LNG and Rio Bravo Pipeline projects by SpaceX apart from and beyond the risks and hazards to the LNG tanker ships. And Union Pacific recently expressed a concern about the risks and hazards the Rio Bravo Pipeline may pose to its rail line along Hwy 77.

      Done Deal? NextDecade got on the Nasdaq stock exchange 07-25-2017, broke two Nasdaq rules, has until 03-06-2018 to comply with the rules if it wants to retain its NEXT listing on the Nasdaq exchange. And the value of its stock shares is down. For more information on NextDecade's Nasdaq problems, see See the “Recent Developments” section of NextDecade's 11-08-2017 FEC Form 10-Q at http://getfilings.com/sec-filings/171108/NextDecade-Corp_10-Q/.

      To check our how its doing on the Nasdaq exchange, see http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/next

      or additional information on problems NextDecade is facing, see my 12-14-2017 comment to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) at http://elibrary.FERC.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20171214-5015

      If you want to be taken seriously as an actual grown up & actually honest person, post under your real name, not as "Anonymous."

      Delete
    2. Was that you at the pro abortion march wearing your pink pussy hat? JOBS ON THE WAY for real men and women. WINNING ! Answer this simple question John, why can’t your save the rgv arm chair fake ass environmentalists group get anyone to show up at your events and meetings? You usually have no more than 10 people show up. Why do you have to go to abortion rallies to take pictures of crowds as if they are part of your group? I enjoy your misery.

      Delete
    3. Yup, it’s about jobs. Liberal protesters hate any form of earning an honest living. They would rather get a government check.

      Delete
    4. LOL at LNG "jobs". Just like those coal jobs Trump was going to bring back right? LOL. Suckers. The world is going renewable and phasing it out. India, France, UK are banning gas burning cars. That is why Saudi Arabia is buying up 10 billion in weapons, and their government is falling apart. They are completely reliant on fossil fuel money and without it will collapse.
      Unlike China, which has wisely invested in solar manufacturing and taken over that market. While our dum dums are stuck behind the times promising LNG jobs to a bunch of half wits. What's more sad is the leadership crisis allowing an explosive gas refinery to even be considered locating 5 miles away from a rocket launch platform. A lot of palms being greased no doubt.

      SpaceX has had multiple rocket launch failures, NASA can't always predict how the launches will go. It would only take one stray piece of a broken rocket to detonate the LNG plant. That is if it ever gets built, the whole proposal looking more and more like the wet dream of a room full of greedy incompetents TBH.

      Delete
    5. Save the rgv from LNG has got themselves handed a royal ass kicking.

      Delete
    6. Not as bad as the inferno burning Port Isabel children alive, at the elementary school near the proposed refinery. After their parents on-site die in a blazing fireball explosion, like it happened at Texas City. One little leak and all it took was a running car motor to light that gas up KA-BOOM

      Delete
    7. Sounds fine. It will be an improvement to port Isabel. I hope you are near by crybaby.

      Delete
  2. The EPA has died a slow painful death. They are irelevant and made obama, gore and killary Clinton a ton of money. With strong leadership now in place we will finally succeed.

    ReplyDelete