Parks & Recreation Board Member Describes Lincoln Park's Nature Center, Trails as "Irreplaceable"
Growing bed at the Nature Center, Lincoln Park |
The board member said he had observed buses of seniors come to Lincoln Park, do a bit of low impact zumba, then walk down the nature trail. The member recalls groups of Boy and Girl Scouts using the garden center to understand planting, cultivating and the growing process.
"You know, Jim, my parents were raised on a farm, but I wasn't. I want my children to understand where grown food comes from and how nature works."
The Nature Center and the Nature Trail are integral parts of the city's Lincoln Park, located on E.
Nature Center gardens at Lincoln Park |
"Were the university to preserve the integrity of the park, the nature center and trail, allowing students to sit on the benches under the trees, accessing the wifi, I could understand it, but to destroy the park for buildings makes absolutely no sense," continued the board member. "There is plenty of undeveloped property nearby to leave the park undisturbed. UTB even owns tracts across the interstate where they plan to put soccer fields."
The person who likely should be out front on this issue is District 1 City Commissioner Ricardo Longoria, whose constituents make up the majority of those using Lincoln Park, which sits just to the west of Southmost. To allow Lincoln Park to be demolished and replaced by buildings is unconscionable and certainly not protecting the long-term interests of District 1. Once gone, Lincoln Park is not coming back.
The spin that will be put on this dumber-than-dumb transaction will be that some of the amenities of Lincoln Park will be added to Gonzalez Park, but that's simply not the reality. Gonzalez Park cannot accommodate what Lincoln Park now offers, does not have the room or the parking to replace two softball fields, an amphitheater, a nature center, two walking trails and picnic sites with metal grills. This is an unnecessary giveaway to UT, but a horrible ripoff for District 1, Southmost residents. Who will stand up and protect their interests?
Portway Acres Park Dedication |
We did contact Park Director Chris Patterson for an interview. He suggested calling his office Monday afternoon, which we did twice, leaving a message both times. We told Chris via Facebook inboxing, that we had no desire to involve him in political entanglement, but were just seeking details about Lincoln Park. Perhaps, Chris will return our call tomorrow.
Lincoln Park's Nature Trail |
Many things have changed in the last year. First of all, the new UT-RGV Brownsville campus will not include the downtown buildings purchased by the City Commission. UT's regents had zero interest in any of the 11 third-tier buildings Tony and the City Commission purchased with taxpayer money. Additionally, there is plenty of available land for the satellite campus without destroying a Brownsville city park.
Lincoln Park's Nature Center |
Children's Garden Education Center at Lincoln Park |
Children's Garden at Lincoln Park |
This week the citizens of the Southmost area will find out whether their city commissioner, Ricardo Longoria has any "huevos", if he serves them or his own political agenda (nuzzling up to the big boyz locally) and if the culture of health and recreation (Rose Gowen) comes second to kissing up to Julieta. Non of these folks have done much lately except buy and sell using our tax dollars and without public input.
ReplyDeleteTony Martinez is now governing like is "idol" Barack Obama....by "executive order"; avoiding all democratic processes. Lincoln Park belongs to the people of Brownsville and they should have a say in any attempt to sell it or give it away to the UT System, one of the richest university systems in the U.S. This meeting and this decision will say a lot about our city leaders.
The U.S. Border Patrol agency announced that it will begin adhering to standards that limit when border agents can use deadly force on border crossers. At the same time, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) made public its deadly force policy for the first time.
ReplyDeleteThe U.S. Border Patrol released a directive — effective immediately — stating that agents “shall not discharge their firearms at a moving vehicle unless the agent has a reasonable belief, based on the totality of the circumstances that deadly force is being used against an agent or another person present.” Agents can only use deadly force when a moving vehicle is driving at them, but the use of deadly force does not extend to “moving vehicles merely fleeing from agents.” The directive also prohibits agents from placing themselves “in the path of a moving vehicle or [using] their body to block a vehicle’s path” — significant given that the leaked review found that agents deliberately blocked vehicles in order to justify shooting the driver.
(significant given that the leaked review found that agents deliberately blocked vehicles in order to justify shooting the driver)
ReplyDeleteWhoa! And, a respectful, thank you.
Jake.