Did The Hernandez-Garcia Camp Get An Assist from The Bailiff?

Liza Parras

Attractive bailiff Liza Parras left her normal post at the courthouse door scanning visitors for hidden metal objects to position herself in the vestibule of the 357th court where reports indicated she attempted to screen certain visitors from entering the audience chambers.  No such hindrance was presented for Erin H. Garcia, who was followed by an entourage of known politiqueras to take their seats, awaiting Judge J. Bonner Dorsey for the September 3 hearing to deal with Yolanda Begum's claim that the Erin H. Garcia camp had been guilty of numerous instances of blatant, verifiable voter fraud.

Parras did also step in when some Begum supporters tried to share coffee and pastries with elderly witnesses who had responded to subpoenas  to testify about Garcia campaign election fraud.  Parras' inappropriate, arbitrary actions seems to harmonize with what may have been Attorney Michael Cowen's overall argument in this election fraud case:  that the actions of the Hernandez-Garcia camp were not merely isolated incidents of voter fraud, but a carefully orchestrated, criminal conspiracy to steal the election.

Reno 911

If Parras participated in this conspiracy, so did Herminia Becerra and Tomasita Chavez, not only in their unlawful work as politiqueras for the Hernandez-Garcia campaign, but in the blatant obstruction of justice observed at the adult high rise, where several witnesses testified they told residents NOT to appear in court as indicated by the subpoenas.  So, with politiqueras harvesting votes, adult day care employees delivering the feeble, challenged and elderly, carefully selected election judges controlling things in the polling places, lookouts announcing incoming vans with herded voters and illegally handled mail-in ballots, Norma, Erin and their politiqueras worked the election with Zeta-like precision.   Understandably, Parras, Erin H. Garcia and Linda Castro Dragustinovis celebrated in the courtroom the dismissal of the election fraud case with the same fervor shown by O.J. Simpson when he apparently couldn't get his hand into a glove and was aquitted of two murders.

Roger "The Dodger" Ortiz

Judge Dorsey's ruling to dismiss the case was not on merit, but on communication from Election Administrator Roger Ortiz that, should Begum win the case and Erin Hernandez appeal, it would invade the normal window needed to print ballots for the November election.  Of course, we find Ortiz in his accustomed role of explaining why voter fraud can't be uncovered, prosecuted, prevented or even discouraged.  Make no mistake, Ortiz is EXACTLY the person the 5 member Election Commission WANTS running local elections, as they are very much a part of this ongoing conspiracy.  .

Bailiff Parra's belligerent courtroom demeanor may have not been her only share in the JP primary.  Documents obtained by CAVA, Citizens Against Voter Abuse, indicate that she signed to vote twice in her pre-divorce name, Elizabeth P. Avitia to vote in early voting at the election office.   CAVA representatives were asked to leave the premises when they tried to investigate the situation before the trial.  Her angry stance at the residence seemed to make sense when they observed Parra's courtroom demeanor.

Adding to the mystery, while CAVA requested from the Election Administrator as early as July a complete list of all election judges and clerks, Ortiz has not been forthcoming.  CAVA has received, however a complete list of all who APPLIED for those positions.  The early voting clerk who signed the document apparently indicating that Parras voted twice was not on ANY of those lists of applicants.

Above Parras signed twice in the space for registered voters with her pre-divorce name, Elizabeth P. Avitia.  There may be some logical, honest explanation for this, but as of today, Election Administrator Roger Ortiz has not responded to CAVA's queries.

Here are the voter names and addresses corresponding with the bailiff's TWO signatures