From the editor: While polls show that most Americans approve of cutting government waste, the approach taken by Elon Musk and his youthful helpers has been reckless and chaotic.
Eventually, the American people will begin to feel the effects of D.O.G.E.'s lack of competence for the task at hand. Frequently, what Musk and company are doing is "cutting off the nose to spite the face" as we used to say.
Most of the country has not felt the effects of Musk's ruthless approach, with the possible exception of Iowa farmers who are seeing millions of dollars of grain rot in storage, undelivered to the countries where there are indeed hungry people.(Don't worry. China, seeing a great opportunity to generate good will for a mere pittance, is willfully picking up our slack as Trump slides our country into "America First" isolationism.
Just this week, D.O.G.E. terminated between 1,200 and 2,000 workers at the Department of Energy, including about 300 who worked at the nuclear staff, managing the nation's nuclear stockpile, among other things. Now, D.O.G.E. is scrambling to hire those workers back, backtracking as it were.
Musk himself, follows no ethical rules, has not filed the financial report required of workers of his status or reported on at least six clear conflicts of interest he has while receiving over $15B in government contracts annually.
This one comment on Musk's noncompliance with ethics rules: “The concerns about conflicts of interest are not just that Musk is potentially pulling strings inside government and gaining access to sensitive information that could advantage his companies and disadvantage rivals.”
Three months after President Donald Trump announced Elon Musk would head up a cost-cutting initiative, and nearly a month after its official creation, the White House has not made public an ethics form disclosing the tech billionaire’s finances or his conflicts of interest.
Trump has classified Musk in a category of temporary federal worker that is required to fill out the same ethics form as Cabinet officials, according to ethics law experts who spoke to USA TODAY. And he’s required to file it publicly, they said.
But while confirmed appointees who run other agencies for Trump have not only filled out disclosure forms but reached agreements to divest from their conflicts of interest, the federal ethics website doesn’t show any such disclosure or agreement for Musk.
All of this, my friends, is a huge recipe for disaster.
Below we post NPR's article on the latest mess from D.O.G.E.
Scenes of confusion and chaos unfolded over the last two days at the civilian agency that oversees the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile, as the Trump administration's mass firings were carried out before being "paused" on Friday.
This account of firings at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is based on interviews with several current and former NNSA employees who asked to remain anonymous, fearing retribution from the Trump administration.
Officials were given hours to fire hundreds of employees, and workers were shut out of email as termination notices arrived. The terminations were part of a broader group of dismissals at the Department of Energy, where reportedly more than a thousand federal workers were terminated. It was all a result of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative to slash the federal workforce and what Musk and President Trump characterize as excessive government spending.
![]() |
Two employees from the National Nuclear Security Administratiion use gamma detectors to test outside a container of highly-enriched uranium for surface contamination |
The NNSA is a semi-autonomous agency within the Department of Energy that oversees the U.S. stockpile of thousands of nuclear weapons. Despite having the words "National" and "Security" in its title, it was not getting an exemption for national security, managers at the agency were told last Friday, according to an employee at NNSA who asked not to be named, fearing retribution from the Trump administration. Just days before, officials in leadership had scrambled to write descriptions for the roughly 300 probationary employees at the agency who had joined the federal workforce less than two years ago.
It was a tall order for the relatively obscure civilian agency that conducts a wide variety of nuclear security missions, including servicing the nation's nuclear weapons when they're not on missiles and bombers, and making extensive safety and security upgrades of the warheads. Some workers were responsible for making sure emergency response plans were in place at sites like a giant facility in Texas, where thousands of dismantled warheads are stored. Others worked to prevent terrorists and rogue nations from acquiring weapons-grade plutonium or uranium. Many had "Q" clearances, the highest level security clearance at the Department of Energy.
In the final days leading up to the firings, managers drew up lists of essential workers and pleaded to keep them.
In the end, it didn't matter. On Thursday, officials were told that the vast majority of the exemptions they had asked for were denied by the Trump administration. Multiple current and former employees at the agency told NPR that scores of people were notified verbally they were fired. Many had to clear out their desks on the spot. "It broke my heart," says one employee who was among those who left the agency's Washington, D.C., headquarters.
![]() |
Members of the Nuclear Emergency Support Team training for a radiological contamination scenario |
But what followed was even more confusing. Employees were told they would receive a letter confirming their termination.
Liz Goggin, a licensed clinical social worker with the Veterans Health Administration (VA), accepted the Trump administration's deferred resignation offer before learning she was exempt.
A federal worker tried to take Trump's 'Fork' resignation offer. Here's what happened
Some did, a letter seen by NPR came late at night, and minutes later their work email ceased to function. "Per OPM [Office of Personnel Management] instructions, DOE finds that your further employment would not be in the public interest," it read in part. The text matched other letters seen by NPR that were sent to employees throughout the Department of Energy. The NNSA termination letter did not appear to make any specific reference to the highly-classified nuclear mission conducted by the agency.
But others at the agency who were told they were terminated never received written notification.
Amid the confusion, employees reached by NPR on Friday were unsure whether they still worked at the agency. "Nobody knows if they're fired or not," said an employee. Two employees still had work laptops and equipment. The laptops did not contain any classified information.
On Friday, an employee still at NNSA told NPR that the firings are now "paused," in part because of the chaotic way in which they unfolded. Another employee had been contacted and told that their termination had been "rescinded." But some worried the damage had already been done. Nuclear security is highly specialized, high-pressure work, but it's not particularly well paid, one employee told NPR. Given what's unfolded over the past 24 hours, "why would anybody want to take these jobs?" they asked.
Many years ago I worked for a state agency that put in place a reduction in force. As an administrator I was trained in how to do it in a way that would maintain the dignity of the employee and provide them with various resources as they began their search for new work. We did it this way because the laid-off employees were all meeting job requirements (it was last hired first fired, providing they were meeting standards) and had contributed to the Agency's goals. It was also done this way to help insure the safety of staff by reducing the possibility that a disgruntled employee would return to the workplace with violence on their mind. This was not long after the term "going postal" had been coined. The way this stuff is currently being done by Trump, Musk and their ilk it may very well generate a violent reaction from an ex-employee who can no longer make their rent or car payment or feed their children, especially if they voted for Trump and feel betrayed on top of the humiliation of the job lose. I don't know if it continues to be true but at one time people considered a job lose to be one of the top five lifetime stressors, up there with death and divorce. If I was an continuing employee in one of the impacted agencies, I would have an escape plan just in case.
ReplyDelete