SUPREME COURT REJECTS STATE CONTROL OF ELECTIONS WITH "UNCLE TOM" AMONG THREE DISSENTERS

Your 2023 U.S. Supreme Court

Whew!  Did we just dodge a bullet or what?

Just heard that the Supreme Court had rejected a Republican-inspired proposal to allow individual states to control how federal elections are handled.

The concept was a glorified, perhaps, more legally digestible twist on the hastily-thrown-together fake electors scam.

The underpinning for state control of elections was the "independent state legislature" theory, something proponents thought the contitution hinted at, but the Supreme Court rejected, 6-3.

As we've harped on here at the Observer, the diversification of the U.S. is a real problem for Republicans.

Former Grand Wizard of the KKK David Duke used to call for Blacks to have their own country with actual borders, but that "solution" was not workable.

Now, with Hispanics nearly the majority in Texas and U.S. Asian populations on the rise as well as that of other ethnicities,  the "Make America White Again" movement is losing steam.

Chief Justice John Roberts announced the Court's decision while "Uncle Tom" Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was one of three dissenters.