by Gary Sargent, The New Republic
![]() |
Donald Trump |
(March 13, 2024) The House GOPβs effort to impeach President Biden appears to be in deep trouble. Republicans are privately admitting that their case against Biden has fizzled. Moderate GOP lawmakers are signaling dread of any impeachment vote. GOP leaders are pathetically concocting an alternative to impeachment in hopes of keeping the MAGA base happy.
But as we watch all this unfold, letβs not lose sight of one critical piece of the story: If the impeachment push has devolved into a farce, it isnβt just because the case against Biden is so weak. Itβs also because the parallel case against Donald Trump is so strong.
That might seem counterintuitive. What does Trumpβs culpability have to do with the case against Biden? Yet step back a bit and the dynamic becomes clear: The GOP arguments for impeaching Biden are revealed at their most absurd when the two cases are laid side by side.
Whatβs more, when the GOPβs game is fully exposedβthat itβs not just about hatching fake evidence of crimes by Biden but also about muddying the waters around evidence of crimes by Trump that is very realβthatβs when the GOP posture becomes most indefensible.
Signs of this dynamic are everywhere. On Tuesday, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing that purported to grill Robert Hur, the special counsel who recently released a report exonerating Biden that also contained damning but gratuitous claims about his age and memory.
The Hur hearing was an opportunity for Republicans to highlight the damaging stuff in the report, which, in addition to faulting Bidenβs memory, detailed evidence that Biden did willfully retain classified documents. Hur recommended against criminal charges because he couldnβt find evidence that Biden did this with corrupt intent despite searching high and low for many months.
But the hearing was largely a bust for Republicans. The savvy observers at Politicoβs Playbook called it a βdudβ and reported that it has prompted Republicans to look for an βoff rampβ from their impeachment push, which turns on a separate set of claims about the Biden familyβs business dealings that have also largely collapsed.
βRepublicans of all ideological persuasions are increasingly admitting that they pulled the trigger on Bidenβs impeachment too soon and that the effort has been hobbled by embarrassing setbacks,β Playbook concluded, noting that this comes after the GOPβs much-advertised βFBI informantβ was indicted for fabricating a story thatβs central to the GOP case.
The Hur hearing helped demonstrate why all this is happening. Some of the biggest moments featured Republicans raging at Hur for failing to recommend criminal charges. Inside the MAGA universe, this is a no-brainer: Of course Hur was supposed to recommend charges, and of course the failure to do so can only have been supreme dereliction of duty. But outside that information space, whatβs become unavoidably obvious is that Republicans are demanding that Biden be charged with crimes no matter what the evidence actually shows.
Meanwhile, many of the hearingβs other breakthrough moments came when Democrats managed to make the proceedings about the former president:
As youβll note, in this exchange, California Representative Ted Lieu recited a litany of things that Trump did with regard to classified documents, and he asked puckishly whether Biden had done them, to which Hur was forced to answer in the negative. Importantly, Liu was drawing on Hurβs own report, which explicitly compares Trumpβs handling of documents to Bidenβs, demonstrating why the former merited criminal charges while the latter did not.
The Democratic strategy in this hearing was to draw out this contrast. As one House Democratic aide told me, the goal was largely to stick βto attacking Trump rather than Hur,β because Democrats wanted to draw Republicans βinto a conversation about Trump.β
This led to some ripe moments. After the hearing, CNNβs Laura Coates grilled Ohio Representative Jim Jordan, the Judiciary chair, by pointing out the contrast in the two presidentsβ handling of documents. Coates asked Jordan if Trump would have been indicted if heβd done what Biden didβturn over documents and cooperate with investigators. Jordan haplessly answered with a yes, but he could only sputter aimlessly when Coates noted that Hur was originally a Trump appointee.
Underscoring the absurdity of all this, ABC News now reports that Republicans may send referrals to the Justice Department recommending prosecutions related to their findings, as an βexit strategyβ from impeachment. While itβs very possible Republicans will ultimately impeach Biden, the case for it has imploded, and this would plainly be the consolation prize thrown to Trump and the MAGA base if it doesnβt happen.
Yet that too only reveals the core absurdity of the GOP game. Republicans wonβt even name which Biden family members would be the target of such referrals, and they know the current Justice Department wouldnβt prosecute them anyway. But Representative James Comer, chair of the Oversight Committee, recently told Fox News that such referrals would lay the groundwork for prosecution under a victorious Trump, who has vowed to prosecute the βBiden crime familyβ without cause.
Incredibly, the Republican message here is basically this: OK, we canβt find any evidence of Biden crimes, but just wait until the guy who promises to prosecute Biden regardless of what the facts show is back in charge! Then weβll get justice! The GOP scam exposes itself.
Trump doesnβt bother trying to hide the corrupt nature of all of this. He openly declares that he will prosecute the Biden family as revenge, i.e., because of what was done to him, not because of anything the Bidens actually did. Similarly, he is calling on Republicans to impeach Biden primarily as retributionβright out in the open, as an applause line at political rallies.
For Trump, all this is perfectly natural: Impeachment and prosecutions canβt ever be legitimately predicated; all is tit for tat; everything is political all the way down. By contrast, Republicans like Jordan and Comer want to retain the thinnest veneer of legitimacy to these proceedings.
Yet thatβs become impossible. At the most fundamental level, the Republican project here is to use all the levers of power at the partyβs disposal to erase a reality that cannot be erased: The case against Trump is based on things that actually happened, while the case against Biden is based largely on inventions. This project utterly collapses at precisely the moments when the two cases are compared side by side most unflinchingly. And given that this juxtaposition derives its ultimate force from the damning evidence of Trumpβs transgressions, Republicans have no one to blame for this fiasco but Trump himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment