Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
𝗗𝗜𝗗𝗗𝗬 𝗙𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗗 "𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗚𝗨𝗜𝗟𝗧𝗬" 𝗢𝗙 𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗘𝗧𝗘𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗦𝗘𝗫 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚, "𝗚𝗨𝗜𝗟𝗧𝗬" 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗪𝗢𝗠𝗘𝗡 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗧𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡
Sean "Diddy" Combs Sean “Diddy” Combs was found not guil...
-
Dr. Lorenzo Pelly M.D., Lic. No. G2453, Brownsville On August 20, 2021. The Board and Lorenzo Pelly, M.D., 2012 Valley Baptist Physician ... -
.png)
photos courtesy of Jerry Danache Driving toward Mexico Boulevard at about 12:50 PM on New Years Day , it occurred to me that the Eddie Garci... -
by Jim Barton on Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 9:19pm Enrique Escobedo, pictured above with convicted R.I.C.O. felon Carlos Quintani...
I’ve heard Special Guest Speaker is one hell of a get. Who hasn’t heard of Special Guest Speaker?
ReplyDeleteAnother novice for "change". zzzzzzzzzzzzz
ReplyDeleteSay the Sucio Lucio's. Scared? Eddie Lucio doesn't represent this area, he only represents the Republicans he sells out to. ANYONE would do a better job.
DeleteCan she cook?
ReplyDeleteA topic to ask Erasmo and Jessica on Sunday
ReplyDeletehttps://rrunrrun.blogspot.com/2019/07/so-if-tetreau-blocks-you-from-facebook.html
TUESDAY, JULY 9, 2019
IF TETREAU, ERASMO BLOCK YOU ON FACEBOOK, IS IT LEGAL?
By Ronn Blitzer
Fox News
A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that President Trump is not allowed to block people on Twitter over statements he does not like, affirming a lower court’s decision that declared the president’s account a “public forum.”
In a Tuesday decision, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals noted that because Trump uses Twitter to communicate with the public about his administration, and his account is open to the public for people to comment on his posts, it warrants constitutional free speech protection under the First Amendment.
“We do conclude,” the opinion said, “that the First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise‐open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees.”
According to court documents, Trump admitted that he blocked the plaintiffs in the case in 2017 after they posted tweets that “criticized him or his policies.” Once they were blocked, they were no longer able to view Trump’s tweets while logged in, and no longer had access to reply to tweets or view comment threads on Trump’s Twitter page.
The First Amendment prohibits government discrimination against a person’s free speech based on their viewpoint. Trump claimed that his Twitter account is private, so the First Amendment should not apply.
The court said that Trump’s account was indeed private before he became president, but that changed once he took office and used it for official business, as it now displays “all the trappings of an official, state‐run account." The court said that once Trump leaves office, his account will be considered private again.
POSTED BY JMON AT 11:43 AM
Ask election legal expert Roman Perez. He'll get DeCoss to file charges with the DA
ReplyDelete