A special meeting of the BISD Board of Trustees dealt with a consent item to increase the collection fee on delinquent taxes from 12.5% to 15%. As noted in earlier articles based on the previous year's collections, this affords Linebarger a raise of at least $125,000 of what they would have collected under the current rate. A video of the entire exchange on the agenda item is at the bottom of this article.
As Board President Enrique Escobedo introduced the agenda item, Trustee Minerva Pena asked permission to raise a point of order. Trustee Presas-Garcia objected and was recognized. Presas-Garcia voiced the erroneous position that because Ms. Pena had voted against the award of the contract to Linebarger, she could not comment on subsequent rate change request. Ms. Presas-Garcia has made this assertion before without anyone on the board challenging her. She is, of course, wrong. How one votes on an issue does not affect their ability to comment or raise a point of order on subsequent matters relating to that issue. This is simply a feeble attempt by Presas-Garcia to suppress alternative viewpoints.
So, Trustee Pena proceeded with her question: "Why is the allowed collection fee being changed from 12.5% to 15%?" The matter was referred to Chief Financial Officer Ismael Garcia. Garcia started with a non-answer: "This does not affect those who pay their taxes on time." Duh!! "92% of our citizens pay their taxes on time and are not affected." Garcia continued. Minerva Pena still didn't understand why the adjustment was being made. "It's because we changed collection firms," the financial officer continued. Someone else explained that the Pena firm charged citizens 12.5% penalty on delinquent taxes whereas Linebarger charges 15%.
At this point Presas-Garcia raised the point of the non-assessment of the home of Enrique Pena, president of E. Pena and Associates, the district's previous tax collection firm. This is a valid point. Enrique Pena is ethically unqualified to collect taxes if he doesn't pay his own. Just for accuracy, though, according to the Brownsville Herald, Pena purchased the land in 2002, paying taxes on the land since. His home, built in 2004, was never assessed. Pena, himself, brought the matter to the appraisal district's attention, according to a BISD spokesperson.
For the record, the Perdue firm had a superior tax collection in all the districts where they succeeded Linebarger. Trustee Aguilar had a question: "Will the district lose money if the rate is raised?" That question revealed that Aquilar is clueless as to how this works. Escobedo called for a vote, which was 4-3 in favor of the raise. The so-called "Majority 4" voted in favor of the increase including Escobedo, Saavedra, Longoria and Presas-Garcia. Colunga, Pena and Agular voted against the increase. .
Here is the video. The signal was somewhat fuzzy.(There are actually 2 videos. My computer is running slow. It may be very late 2/15/12 before both are uploaded.)
So to catalina, enrique, lucy, and cristina, the new firm's increase in taxes to us, the taxpayers does not mean anything at all??
ReplyDelete(higher case letter on their fist names are omitted for a reason)
This is obviouus that the $$$$negotiation had been made prior!!
Oh! and michel ismael and carl are just a bunch of laughing clowns
If you pay taxes you shouldn't worry.
DeleteThe 15% penalty is for the people like minerva peña that have not paid their taxes for several years and that is on different properties.
So let's see... Linebarger expects to recover no more in delinquent taxes than Pena did but, will be paid an extra 2.5% from the pockets of those least likely to pay. Additionally, the Purdue firm can prove a better collection rate than Lineburger, yet the majority 4 reward the firm that that bought them months ago. Seems like the blogger BWC is correct, the board majority are whores to Linebarger. Parker, Rendon and anyone else who gives them a few dollars. The decisions being made will hurt this district for years to come.
ReplyDeleteThe fabulous 4 bought and now paid. Let's see what they do next to further their own agendas and personal rewards. Also, no one has mentioned the number of greivances they disposed of this week, not to mention those that are pending. It would be interesting to know how much all their unjustified reassignments, so swiftly and happily carried out by their beloved HR head, cost us taxpayers.
ReplyDeleteI been telling you all along that these whores were going to go, and went, to whoever paid them the most. So I guess Quintanilla knew what he was talking about, when he called them "whores and pieces of shit" just wondering if they are "sharing the earnings with him" ..lol
ReplyDeleteMINERVA OWES A LOT OF TAXES AND SHE HAS NOT PAYED THEM FOR SEVERAL YEARS.
DeleteWhere are the records that Pena has not paid for several years????????????? Looked and did not find them?????????
DeleteWhat is the matter babies? Why is your boy toy ditching things against you on this one? Hu? I guess you did not share the "earnings" with him hu?
ReplyDeleteIf you Board Members don't think We the community knows about all the grievances you been disposing of, you are totally WRONG, 'cause we do, we have copies of all grievances you guys have dissmissed without even calling the parties involved!!!!
ReplyDeleteLet's see de cual cuero salen mas correas
These people are an embarrassment to their community, their country and their race!
ReplyDelete"These people are an embarrassment to their community, their county, and their race!"
ReplyDeleteNot to mention their poor families!!
Great picture of Escobedo, looks like he just farted.
ReplyDeleteIF YOU CHECK THE PENAñA HAVE A HABIT OF OWING TAXES, AND MINERVA PEñA OWES A LOT OF PROPERTY TAXES.
ReplyDeleteAS A MATTER OF FACT MINERVA PEñA SHOULD NOT BE ON THE BOARD IF SHE OWES TAXES.
Yes. The Brownsville Herald article indicated Pena's extended family had some tax delinquency.
DeleteJim
Hey, now that we are complaining on Board Members, what is up with the Car Cata Presas-Garcia drives? According to Brownsville Voice Blog Cata Presas-Garcia obain a car under false pretence. The Car she drives was obtain in the name of Alma Alvarado. Cata Presas-Garcia had her friend apply for a car loan at a Bank in a false application. Her friend claimed on the Bank application that she was buying a car for herself, when in fact she was buying the car for Cata Presas-Garcia; because Cata Presas-Garcia could not get the car on her own. What is up Cata Presas-Garcia? Can you not even get a car in your own name. WHY? How can you ask a BISD employee to use their name and their credit rating to purchase a car in their name for you, so you can make the payments at a lower interest rate. Is that not Fraud at a FDIC Bank? How can you drive around in that "Car" without feeling shame? Guess you have no sense of pride.
ReplyDeleteShe is the most ignorant person I have ever met in my life!!! She did not think we, the community can catch up to all of her lies???
Delete