Monday, March 24, 2025

𝗜𝗦 𝗨.𝗦. 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗧 𝗝𝗨𝗗𝗚𝗘 𝗝𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗦 𝗕𝗢𝗔𝗦𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗚 𝗔𝗡 "𝗜𝗗𝗜𝗢𝗧" 𝗕𝗘𝗖𝗔𝗨𝗦𝗘 𝗛𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗦 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗗𝗢 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗚𝗦 𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬?

                                      

Venezuelan immigrants, with shaved heads, shackled arms and legs, being forcefully led to the aircraft deporting them to a contractor prison in El Salvador

On an extensive posting on Facebook, three of my friends have used the word "idiot" to describe U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg because he placed a restraining order on Donald Trump, with respect to his unlawful technique in deporting Venezuelan immigrants to a horrible prison in El Salvador.  

Judge Boasberg was not opposing the deportation, but just wanted Trump to do it lawfully with due process.  Of course, Trump, himself a convicted criminal, has zero respect for law as he, once again, demonstrated by disobeying the order.

Pretending our nation is at war, although as President he's not declared one, Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, last used in 1942 during WWII, to set up Japanese Internment Camps in Washington state, about 20 miles from Renton Hospital where I was born 6 years later.

Although Trump longs to be a dictator with every fiber of his being, we're not a dictatorship yet and things have to done lawfully, not recklessly.

As Judge Boebert said: “Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on another equally fundamental theory: before they may be deported, they are entitled to individualized hearings to determine whether the Act applies to them at all. . . . Because the named Plaintiffs dispute that they are members of Tren de Aragua, they may not be deported until a court has been able to decide the merits of their challenge.”

Judge Boebert patiently explained: “The Order did not prevent Defendants from removing anyone — to include members of the class — through other immigration authorities such as the [Immigration and Nationality Act]. Indeed, as previously mentioned, those affiliated with Tren de Aragua were all already deportable under that statute as members of an [Foreign Terrorist Organization],”

He said the roughly 260 Venezuelans brought to El Salvador under both the Alien Enemies Act and through immigration authorities were not informed where they were being taken and did not have an opportunity to raise a convention against torture claims.

“Without such information, even if they had been given an opportunity to raise a torture claim, they would not have been able to meaningfully do so,” Boasberg wrote.

Believe me, I understand the depth of MAGA sentiments, but we're still a nation governed by law and our judicial system does not operate as fast as simply writing an Executive Order as Trump prefers, or executing suspected drug dealers and their families without a trial as former Philippines President Duterte has repeatedly done. (In four years Duterte's goons executed over 30,000.)

Justice can be slow and unwieldy, but rash, careless, unlawful actions get people killed or falsely imprisoned.

President Trump, White Supremacist Stephen Miller, I.C.E. Director Tom Homan





Sunday, March 23, 2025

𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗛𝗢 𝗦𝗜𝗫𝗧𝗛 𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗧𝗘𝗔𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗥 𝗢𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗗 𝗕𝗬 𝗦𝗖𝗛𝗢𝗢𝗟 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗧 𝗧𝗢 𝗥𝗘𝗠𝗢𝗩𝗘 𝗧𝗪𝗢 𝗦𝗜𝗚𝗡𝗦 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗠 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗠 𝗪𝗔𝗟𝗟~𝗧𝗘𝗔𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗦, 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗪𝗢𝗨𝗟𝗗 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗗𝗢?

                                   

       

The two "controversial" signs

"There are only two opinions on this sign: Everyone is welcome here, or not everyone is welcome here,” argues Sarah Inama, a sixth-grade history teacher.


By Alex Portée | TODAY • Published March 15, 2025 • 


An Idaho teacher is in a standoff with her own school district after officials ordered her to remove classroom signs, including one that reads, “Everyone is welcome here.” 

                                               

Sarah Inama

Sarah Inama, a sixth-grade history teacher at Lewis and Clark Middle School in Meridian, Idaho, says she won't comply with the order, arguing that the message is a fundamental part to ensuring a positive learning environment for her students.

Inama, who has taught at the school for five years, says her commitment to inclusivity isn't about politics. It's about her passion for education and students.

“I love the area that I teach,” she says in an interview. “It’s really a valuable thing for people to know our human history, things that humans have accomplished, our time on this earth, things that they’ve overcome, patterns that exist.”

Five years ago, when she first put up the two signs, it was to make sure students knew they were in an open and welcoming space.  Now, she says she is risking her job in the name of those values.

A notice from her school district to remove signs of inclusivity

Inama says the controversy began in January when her principal and vice principal came to her classroom to inform her that two posters on her walls were controversial and needed to be removed, a detail the district verified in an email to TODAY.com. Inama says other teachers were given similar instruction, but she was caught off guard by the directive.

Photos of the two posters show that one features the phrase “Everyone is welcome here,” with an illustration of hands in different skin tones. The other says that everyone in the classroom is "welcome, important, accepted, respected, encouraged, valued" and "equal."

“I was just so confused,” she recalls. “I still can’t even wrap my head around what they’re referring to as far as why it’s controversial.”

Inama says the principal cited district policy that classrooms must respect the rights of people to express differing opinions and that decorations are to be “content-neutral.”

“There are only two opinions on this sign: Everyone is welcome here or not everyone is welcome here," she says. "Since the sign is emphasizing that everyone, in regards to race or skin tone, is welcome here no matter what, immediately, I was like, the only other view of this is racist. And I said, ‘That sounds like racism to me.’”

Feeling pressured, Inama removed the signs, but reconsidered as the decision weighed on her into the following weekend.

“I told my husband, ‘I have to put that sign back up,’" she recalls.

That Saturday, she says her husband accompanied her back to the school where she re-hung the signs and emailed her principal to let him know.

"I just was not interested in taking it down," she says. "I didn’t agree with why they were asking me to take it down. And for that reason, it was back up.”

According to Inama, the principal warned her that her refusal constituted insubordination and could result in further action.

TODAY.com has reached out to the principal for comment on Inama's allegations but did not receive a response.

A meeting was soon arranged with district personnel, including West Ada School District’s chief academic officer Marcus Myers and a West Ada Education Association representative.

In its email to TODAY.com, West Ada School District states that the meeting was arranged to "provide further clarification and support" to Inama and to "discuss concerns about the poster and how it violates Policy 401.20." The policy says that banners in the classroom must be "content-neutral and conducive to a positive learning enviornment."

TODAY.com reached out to Myers for comment regarding the district’s decision and his role in the discussion with Inama but has not yet received a response.

Inama says the officials offered to purchase any alternative signs for her classroom during the meeting, just as long as they didn't have the same messages as her current posters. Challenging the request, Inama pointed out that district policy classifies motivational posters as learning aids, which she argued should be allowed under the current rules.

Inama says the conversation escalated when Myers attempted to justify the request to remove her posters saying that "the political environment ebbs and flows, and what might be controversial now might not have been controversial three, six, nine months ago, and we have to follow that.”

The more the discussion continued, Inama says she became increasingly convinced that what the district was asking her to do was wrong.

“The more that we talked about it, the more it just solidified,” she says. “It seems so gross what they’re asking me to compromise about. I mean, there’s no way you’ll convince me that the differing view they’re trying to protect of that sign is not racist.”

She says the meeting ended without resolution and another warning, this time that further action might be necessary if she did not comply.

After their meeting, Inama says the district offered to have legal counsel review her position, but that she would have to submit an email explaining why she believed the poster did not violate policy.

"I typed a big, long email and sent it off to them about why it was important for me to keep this poster up and why I don't find it to be in violation," Inama explains.

A week later, the district responded, maintaining that the signs violated policy. Inama says she was told she has until the end of the school year to remove them.

In a statement issued to TODAY.com via email, Niki Scheppers, chief of staff for communications at West Ada School District, explains the district’s decision to enforce its policy.

“West Ada School District has been and always will be committed to fostering a welcoming and supportive learning environment for all students while upholding district policies,” the statement reads.

“Classrooms are places where students learn to read, write, think critically and build the skills needed for future success. While classroom decorations can contribute to the atmosphere, a truly welcoming and supportive environment is built through meaningful relationships and positive interactions between staff and students, not posters on the walls. Our focus is on fostering kindness, respect and academic achievement so that every student can thrive in a distraction-free learning environment.”

According to the statement, approved classroom displays include the Idaho state flag, instructional materials like the periodic table or U.S. Constitution, student artwork, approved club information and school-sponsored achievements. Other permitted items include temporary displays of world flags for educational purposes, personal family photos of employees and promotional materials from colleges or professional sports teams.

“This policy is designed to maintain consistency across all classrooms while ensuring that no one group is targeted or offended by the display of certain items.”

The district underlined that its policies are not intended to limit free speech but to ensure fairness in classroom materials.

“While we respect individuals’ rights to express their perspectives, it is important to reaffirm that this situation is not about limiting speech or expression but about ensuring consistency in our classrooms and maintaining a learning environment free from distraction,” the statement said.

The district confirmed that legal counsel determined Inama’s poster must be removed and that she has until the end of the school year to find an alternative that complies with policy.

Despite the district’s ruling, Inama refuses to remove the signs, even if it means risking her job.

                                     


Sarah Inama says her students have shown support to her through friendship bracelets. (Courtesy Sarah Inama)

“I would feel so sad to like leave my students before the end of the year, and financially, it would be difficult, but I just feel like your job, like your specific workplace, is not like your whole identity," she explains. "There's no way I would be able to allow myself to just take it down and roll over to what I feel like they're asking me to do."

Inama says what helps her now is knowing that she is not alone in her resistance. She says hundreds of people — including teachers across the district — have reached out to extend their support since her story became public.

“I'd say at least half of them are from other teachers in this district and in some of the other districts in Idaho and in other states,” she says.

Above all, Inama says she will prioritize the students seated in her classroom and stand by what she believes to be right.


𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗜𝗠𝗣𝗔𝗖𝗧 𝗢𝗙 𝗜𝗠𝗠𝗜𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗦 𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗨.𝗦. 𝗘𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗢𝗠𝗬~𝗟𝗘𝗧'𝗦 𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗞 𝗔𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗡𝗨𝗠𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗦!

 

From the editor: All of the numbers used in the report below come from the Congressional Budget Office.  

                                       


                                 

Despite the stock market being down $4T since Trump took office January 20, the "King of Tariffs" is stubbornly forging ahead with round 2 of anti-free trade tariffs.

But, that's not the only way Trump is wrecking the good economy he inherited from the mumbling Biden.  Trump's obsession with the deportation of immigrants, most here legally, is set to do horrific damage to our nation's financial well-being.

In 2024, immigrants contributed significantly to the U.S. economy, with the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimating that a surge in immigration will boost GDP by $7 to $8.9 trillion over the next decade, increase federal revenues by $1.2 trillion between 2024 and 2034, and reduce the federal deficit by $0.9 trillion.

In 2022, immigrants paid an estimated $383 billion in federal taxes.  They also pay billions into Social Security and Medicare although most will never be eligible for payments.

The chart below shows the net effect of immigration on Federal revenues and deficit reduction, although Trump's fixation with deportations will change those numbers.

                                        


Also farmers from across the country — from small organic berry growers in Maine to large-scale hog producers in Iowa — say those Trump's immigration policy changes could cripple their businesses if they aren’t resolved soon, wreaking long-lasting damage on the U.S. agriculture industry. 

"It's a lot of hands to hand-harvest fruits and vegetables," New Jersey farmer Kurt Alstede said. 

More than two-thirds of U.S. crop workers are foreign born, according to the USDA. Many of them came to the country through the H-2A visas, but officials estimate that 42% of the workers are undocumented migrants.

Now, let me share the MAGA counterargument:  MAGA claims that undocumented immigrants receive "free money" and send $44B of that back to their countries of origin.

Well, first of all, undocumented immigrants are not eligible for federal healthcare programs such as Medicaid, CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program), or Medicare, or to purchase coverage through the ACA Marketplaces

They are, however, eligible for emergency medical care under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). 

Also, some states have established fully state-funded programs to provide coverage to immigrants regardless of immigration status, although eligibility and benefits vary. 

California became the first state to offer health insurance to all eligible undocumented adults, expanding Medi-Cal coverage to low-income immigrants regardless of their immigration status. 

Some other states, like Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, and Washington, also offer state-funded coverage or subsidies for immigrants, regardless of their status. 

An estimated 60% of illegal immigrant households currently use at least one welfare program, with an estimated $5,692 in federal benefits received annually. Some benefits, such as the EITC and CTC, provided an estimated $3.8 to $4.5 billion in outright cash payments to illegal immigrants during 2024.

So, yes, undocumented immigrants received between $3.8 and $4.5B in cash payments in 2024, but remember they paid $383B in federal taxes in 2023 and billions into Social Security and Medicare and also are expected to grow our economy by between $7 and $8.9T between 2024 and 2034, while reducing the national deficit by $0.9T.  That's TRILLION!

Increased immigration creates a larger labor force and increases demand for goods and services, which in turn drives economic growth. 

Immigrants also contribute to overall economic growth by expanding the labor force and increasing consumer spending. 

Many immigrant entrepreneurs are also driving innovation and job creation in the U.S. 

In 2024, 46.0 percent of all Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children. 

These new American firms generated $8.6 trillion in revenue in fiscal year 2023, exceeding the GDP of many developed countries. 

Effects of the Immigration Surge on the Federal Budget and ...

Jul 23, 2024 — CBO estimates that increased immigration will add $1.2 trillion in federal revenues over the 2024–2034 period. 

Looking at all these numbers, it's obvious that immigration, legal and undocumented has been a tremendous financial boon to the United States.

Trump wants to wreck all that because of his overt racism.

𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗧𝗢 𝗗𝗘𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 𝟱𝟯𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝗖𝗨𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗦, 𝗛𝗔𝗜𝗧𝗜𝗔𝗡𝗦, 𝗡𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗔𝗚𝗨𝗔𝗡𝗦 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗘𝗭𝗨𝗘𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗦~𝟮𝟰𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝗨𝗞𝗥𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗔𝗡𝗦 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗡𝗘𝗫𝗧!

 “Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

"The New Colossus" by Emma Lazarus



"Liberty's Lament" by Jennifer Oakley-Delaplante


The United States, America, if you will, is no longer the country many of us grew up thinking it was.  We're no longer that place of refuge, a "hiding place from the wind," that refugees, victims of oppression and persecution could come, raise their families, make an honest living and become part of what we used to call the "American Dream."

In a move of pure, unadulterated racism, the Trump administration has announced that it's revoking the protected legal status of 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans in the United States, according to a Federal Register notice on Friday, the latest expansion of his crackdown on immigration.

The move, effective April 24, cuts short a two-year "parole" granted to the migrants under former President Joe Biden that allowed them to enter the country by air if they had U.S. sponsors.

Trump, a Republican, took steps to ramp up immigration enforcement after taking office, including a push to deport record numbers of migrants in the U.S. illegally. He has argued that the legal entry parole programs launched under his Democratic predecessor overstepped the boundaries of federal law and called for their termination in a January 20 executive order.

Trump said on March 6 that he would decide "very soon" whether to strip the parole status from some 240,000 Ukrainians who fled to the U.S. during the conflict with Russia. Trump's remarks came in response to a Reuters report that said his administration planned to revoke the status for Ukrainians as soon as April.

Under Trump, himself a convicted criminal, a man with no empathy or moral code, our country is quickly turning into a country without compassion or empathy, governed by a man who emulates the ruthless dictatorial style of Vlad Putin, Viktor Orban, Kim Jong Un and Nicolas Maduro.

                                     


Yet, Donald Trump's actual role model is Adolf Hitler of Nazi Germany.  Hear me out MAGA adherents and, if any of the following is inaccurate, please let me know in the comments.

First of all, did you know that when Trump said Haitians and other immigrants were "poisoning the blood of our nation," that was a direct quote from Hitler?

Were you aware that when Trump referred to his political opponents as "vermin," that was the same term Hitler used to refer to social democrats, communists, trade unionists and other political opponents? 

Of course, Hitler wanted to purge Germany of anyone he felt weakened the genetic makeup of the country.  That included the disabled. (Do you recall Trump mocking the disabled?) 

Hitler wanted to rid Germany of, not only Jews, but Roma, Sinti, Blacks and Slavics, anyone not of pure Aryan bloodline. Do you see any resemblance?

Trump's obsession with deporting law-abiding, legal Haitian immigrants from Springfield, Ohio was not because they were raping, pillaging and terrorizing the town. They were not.  By all reports, they were model citizens who worked hard and contributed to the community.

Trump's disdain for the Haitians in Springfied was based on pure, unadulterated racism, the primary fuel that feeds his unhinged mind.

Overt racism also fueled the language Trump used as he descended the golden escalator in 2015 to announce his candidacy for President, referring to Mexican Nationals as "rapists" and "murderers."

Interestingly, Trump's first wife, Ivana Trump, claims Trump was fascinated by Hitler, keeping a copy of Hitler's speeches on his nightstand.

                                  


While he denies it now, Trump has told others that he read Hitler's most famous literary work, Mein Kamf, which means "The Big Lie." 

Hitler used lies to stay in power.  He lied about using violence, lied about his own past, lied to world leaders about his intentions, lied about what he called the "Global Jewish Conspiracy."

Lügenpresse is German for the "lying press," a term Hitler used to describe the media of his day.  Sound familiar?  Trump calls "them" the "fake news."  Same difference.  Same technique used to weaken reporting efforts.

"Look at them back there," Trump tells his MAGA crowd while pointing to the back of the hall.  

"They will go home and write lies.  They're fake news."

No, this is not the America many of us grew up with and were proud to be a part of.  Now our government is taking dramatic steps to reverse policies that once welcomed immigrants to be part of a great nation.  

We've made the Statue of Liberty weep.


Saturday, March 22, 2025

𝗪𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗔𝗕𝗘 𝗗𝗜𝗖𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗢𝗥 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗗𝗘𝗙𝗜𝗘𝗦 𝗝𝗨𝗗𝗚𝗘, 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗧𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗥𝗨𝗟𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗟𝗔𝗪 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗔𝗟 𝗗𝗘𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗢𝗙 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗘𝗭𝗨𝗘𝗟𝗔𝗡 𝗜𝗠𝗠𝗜𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗦

                                                              


The Trump administration is rapidly morphing our country into Nazi Germany, Putin's Russia and/or Maduro's Venezuela.  The triumvirate of assholes pictured above just deported a group of Venezuelans, most here legally, without any regard for due process or the rule of law.  

Hell, Trump, like a dictator wannabe, ignored U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg's order to halt the Venezuelan's flight to an El Salvador terrorism confinement center until it could be determined if these immigrants had actually violated laws or if they were members of the Tren de Aragua gang as our frequently-untruthful President claimed.

                                                                     


Without due process, the immigrants had their heads shaved, legs and arms shackled, then were forced to march to the departing aircraft with armed guards forcing down their torsos.

The torture camp the U.S. government contracted with El Salvador has no windows. Prisoners are not allowed to go outside, staying in a cell of 80 men 23.5 hours per day with metal bunks, no mattresses, sheets or pillows and open toilets. 

                                                               

Soccer Coach Reyes Barrios

                                        

The mother of soccer coach Reyes Barrios burst into tears recognizing her son as one of the detainees being sent to prison.  She stated that her son was not a gang member as Trump and his hosts claimed. 

The Trump administration responded by saying he had a Real Madrid tattoo and had been photographed giving a "hook 'em" sign.


                              

Los Angeles Lakers Luka Doncic as a member of Real Madrid~Should he be deported?


Well, boys and girls, to understand the hypocrisy, Real Madrid is the former team of Los Angeles Lakers superstar Luka Doncic and, as for "hook 'em" signs, please notice the dynamic duo below displaying the same sign: 

We may never know if these Venezuelan deportees were actually gang members, but do clearly understand that Donald Trump and his administration have zero respect for the Constitution or the rule of law.  Trump himself is neither a Christian or a patriot, but a common criminal for whom 52.5% of Cameron County foolishly and, without understanding, cast their votes.






𝗔𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗞/𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗧𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗠 𝗪𝗥𝗘𝗖𝗞𝗦 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗬, 𝗟𝗔𝗨𝗚𝗛𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗜𝗦 𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗟𝗟 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝗠𝗘𝗗𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗡𝗘!

 


𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗘 𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗥𝗘𝗦 𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗠𝗜𝗧𝗦 𝗙𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗣𝗛𝗢𝗧𝗢𝗦 𝗕𝗬 𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗥𝗬 𝗕𝗥𝗢𝗪𝗡𝗦𝗩𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗘 𝗣𝗛𝗢𝗧𝗢𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗣𝗛𝗘𝗥 𝗥𝗢𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗧 𝗥𝗨𝗡𝗬𝗢𝗡

From the editor: Rene Torres has kindly submitted four exquisite photos from the Robert Runyon collection.  Below the photos is a biography from The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley library. 

Brownsville Ferry Crossing to Santa Cruz, Matamoros

Military Bicycles with Sidecars at Fort Brown

The Brownsville Airport

Brownsville Street and Interurban Railway

Biography from The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley University Library:

Robert Runyon= 7/28/1881-3/9/1968



Early photo of Robert Runyon


Robert Runyon was born on a farm near Catlettsburg in Boyd County, Kentucky, on July 28, 1881, the son of Floyd and Elizabeth (Lawson) Runyon. Like many farm boys of his generation, he received only a limited formal education that did not extend through high school, a handicap he overcame in later life through self-instruction, determination, and sheer natural intelligence. On September 16, 1901, Runyon married Norah Young in Ironton, Ohio. The couple's only child, William, was born on August 6, 1904, in Ashland, Kentucky, where Runyon had taken a job selling insurance.

On December 3, 1908, Norah died. In an effort to put the impact of her death behind him, Runyon left William with his late wife's parents and went to New Orleans and then to Houston looking for employment. In early 1909 the Gulf Coast News and Hotel Company hired him to sell sandwiches, fruit, candy, and cigarettes to passengers on the St. Louis, Brownsville, and Mexico Railway between Houston and Brownsville, Texas. Within a couple of months the railway offered to make him manager of Gulf Coast's lunchroom and curio shop in the Brownsville depot. Runyon accepted the position and, in April 1909, rented a room across the street from the railroad station and began a period of residency in Brownsville that continued without interruption for fifty-nine years until his death in 1968.

Arriving in Brownsville, Texas, in 1909, Robert Runyon entered a world very different from his native Kentucky. With its tropical climate and close proximity to Mexico, the town embraced two cultures and thrived on diversity. Throughout the rest of his life, Runyon took an avid interest in studying and recording this unique area. His photographs of the Lower Rio Grande Valley and Northeastern Mexico both document the region's history and stand as testimony to Runyon's affinity for the land and its people.

                                        

Robert Runyon with wife Amelia Leonor Medrano Longoria and children; Lillian, Amali, Virginia, Robert and Delbert

Runyon returned to Kentucky in the summer of 1910 to bring William back to Texas to live with him. On July 31, 1913, Runyon married Amelia Leonor Medrano Longoria, a young woman from a respected middle-class family with deep roots in northern Mexico. Between 1914 and 1926, Amelia bore five children: Lillian, Amali, Virginia, Robert, and Delbert.

Robert Runyon worked as a commercial photographer from 1910 to 1926. During that time, he focused his camera on the mundane and the dramatic alike. His first images recorded urban life in Brownsville and Matamoros as well as the Rio Grande terrain. Then, during the summer and fall of 1913, he turned his attention to political events in Mexico as the Mexican Revolution reached the Texas border. On June 3, General Lucio Blanco and his Constitutionalist forces captured the Federal garrison at Matamoros. The next day, Runyon moved throughout the city, photographing the results of battle. He later recorded Blanco's land distribution cerermony and Los Borregos in August and proceeded to travel with Blanco's army south to Ciudad Victoria. Several months later, he returned to photograph Revolutionary events in Monterrey. Back in Texas, Runyon also photographed the results of two 1915 bandit raids across the U.S. border: the August 15 raid at Norias Ranch and the October 10 train wreck at Olmito. Although small in number, Runyon's images of the Mexican Revolution have great historical significance. The conflict between Rebels and Federals in Northeastern Mexico has gone largely undocumented; his photographs provide a unique record of this important event.

As the Revolution intensified, the United States responded by activating Fort Brown and transferring soldiers from across the country to the Brownsville camp. Runyon prodigiously recorded this military buildup and the subsequent preparations from U.S. entry into World War I. His photographs show the military transition from animal to mechanical power that occurred during this time period as well as the soldiers' camp life and leisure activities. As with popular subjects such as bullfights and Mexican Revolution casualties, Runyon sold many of his Fort Brown views as postcards to the soldiers and to Valley residents and tourists.

After the tumultuous decade of the 1910s, Runyon returned to familiar subjects in the peaceful and prosperous 1920s. He continued to document city life in the Lower Rio Grande Valley and in Matamoros, Mexico, and he also took many photographs of local beaches, lakes, and, especially, the Rio Grande. He began to pursue a growing interest in botany as well and used his camera to record native plants, including palm trees, yucca, and cactus. Runyon also continued to make and market postcards, but his most profitable enterprise during the early 1920s was studio photography. He aggressively promoted his small studio opposite the Brownsville railroad depot, drawing in thousands of customers and enjoying unprecedented popularity as a commercial photographer. In addition to studio work, he photographed school groups, sports teams, and the numerous excursion groups which came to Brownsville in the early 1920s as potential participants in the Valley land boom.

By 1926, however, Runyon decided to leave commercial photography for the more profitable trade in curios and souvenirs. He became a partner with this brother-in-law in a curio store in Matamoros, and later owned a store in Brownsville. Although he continued to take pictures of plants in conjunction with his botanical studies, after the late 1920s Runyon built his reputation as a highly successful amateur botanist and local politician rather than a photographer. Runyon published two books on native plants, Texas Cacti (1930) and Vernacular Names of Plants Indigenous to the Lower Rio Grande Valley (1938), and in the 1920s began a crusade to save the native Texas palm, Sabal texana. Local politics became Runyon's passion in the late 1930s. He was appointed Brownsville city manager in 1937 and in 1941 was elected mayor. The "stormy petrel" of Brownsville politics, as Runyon was known, held the position through 1943. In 1952 he unsuccessfully ran for Texas House of Representatives. Runyon published a newspaper in the 1940s and wrote a small volume on family history, Genealogy of the Descendants of Anthony Lawson of Northumberland, England.

Robert Runyon died on March 9, 1968, in Brownsville after a short illness at the age of eighty-seven.

Texas folklorist J. Frank Dobie, an acquaintance of Runyon, best summed up his life: "You have to admire a man like Runyon, who cuts off a little hunk of the world and dedicates a lifetime to its study."

http://runyon.lib.utexas.edu/bio.html





Friday, March 21, 2025

𝟭𝟵𝟴𝟲 "𝗖𝗛𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗔𝗡 𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗢𝗥" 𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗟𝗘 𝗗𝗘𝗧𝗔𝗜𝗟𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗢𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗥 𝗥𝗢𝗠𝗘𝗥𝗢 𝗦𝗛𝗘𝗟𝗧𝗘𝗥/𝗢𝗭𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗠 𝗖𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗧𝗢𝗡𝗬 𝗭𝗔𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗧𝗔 𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡

From the editor:  A reader challenged the accuracy of our story about the Oscar Romero Shelter:

"Either you or Rene or both of you needs to recheck the location of Casa Oscar Romero.  It was on Minnesota Avenue just a few blocks from the intersection with Boca Chica.  It has since been expanded and renamed the Ozanon (sp) Shelter.  It now serves as Brownsville's homeless shelter."

This was our response:

Jim Barton March 21, 2025 at 12:05 PM

The Oscar Romero shelter was originally set up in San Benito with 20 beds, but when the shelter began housing many more than that, the city of San Benito threatened daily fines. So, in 1986, the Catholic Church purchased six acres on Minnesota Road for construction of a new Oscar Romero shelter, later renamed the Ozanam Center. https://www.csmonitor.com/1986/1218/ashelt-f.html

Published below is a 1986 article from The Christian Science Monitor providing the details of this story:

                                   


                               


 CENTRAL AMERICAN REFUGEES FIND MIXED WELCOME IN SOUTH TEXAS                                     



By Howard LaFranchi, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

Dec. 18, 1986, 12:12 p.m. ET

Brownsville, Texas


At the JC Grocery on the west side of this Texas border town, dollar bills and silver change pile up in a jar sitting prominently on the counter. The only hint of the collection's purpose is a sticker that carries a drawing of a house with a slash through it next to the words ``Casa Romero No!'' ``We're trying to raise some money to help stop this thing,'' says Bertha Garcia, whose store is a few blocks from where the Roman Catholic Church proposes to build a shelter for Central Americans seeking refuge in the United States. ``I have nothing against these people,'' she adds, ``but it's getting to be like a snowball rolling downhill. It keeps getting bigger and bigger, and it has to stop somewhere. I'm just saying, not here.''

The church will probably build its shelter, having been granted permits by the Cameron County Commission to locate the facility on six acres just outside the Brownsville city limits. Few locals give much chance to a lawsuit filed by landowners from around the proposed site, who challenge the plan's compliance with subdivision regulations.

Yet the unabated controversy over the proposed shelter signifies a changing attitude in the Rio Grande Valley toward illegal aliens, many valley residents believe. The debate also reflects concern about anything perceived as a threat to the area's already weak economy, some say, as well as lingering resentment over the role the Catholic Church has played in making the valley the first US destination for many Central Americans fleeing their countries.

The new shelter would replace the original Casa Oscar Romero, situated in a residential neighborhood in the little town of San Benito, 20 miles north of Brownsville. Opened in 1982, Casa Romero achieved national notoriety when its former directors were convicted of transporting undocumented aliens across the border.

The church attempted to reduce the shelter's profile by replacing its politicized lay directors with nuns. But by that time Casa Romero had become well known in Central America. A shelter originally intended for 20 people regularly housed 200 or more - mostly Salvadoreans and Nicaraguans, but also Guatemalans and Hondurans fleeing the region's strife. As complaints from neighbors about overcrowding mounted, San Benito ordered Casa Romero to move from its current site by Dec. 5 or face a $100-a-day fine. But the controversy in Brownsville has held up the relocation.

                                      

Dr. Antonio (Tony) Zavaleta

For Antonio Zavaleta, an anthropology professor at Texas Southmost College here, Brownsville's response to Casa Romero is one manifestation of what he calls the ``growing hysteria'' - in the Rio Grande Valley, as well as throughout Texas and the nation - over increased illegal immigration during the past few years.

``There is historical precedence for how Americans have responded to immigration during certain situations,'' Professor Zavaleta says, pointing to the mass deportation of Mexicans during the Great Depression, and the confinement of Japanese during World War II. ``If this is a swinging of the pendulum, it's not gone as far as it's going to go.''

With unemployment in the Rio Grande Valley running as high as 20 percent, many people lump the Central Americans staying at Casa Romero with illegal aliens in general, says the Rev. Leonard de Pasquale, a priest at Our Lady of Guadalupe Church here. The irony, he adds, is that virtually none of Casa Romero's ``guests'' plan to stay in the valley.

``They are headed to places like Houston and Chicago and Washington and Miami,'' he says, ``but that doesn't stop people here from thinking, `They're coming to take our jobs, to take our wealth away, to move into our neighborhoods.' The fears have really built up.''

Fr. de Pasquale blames much of the tension on the district office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. He says the INS ``bottles up'' the Central Americans who are in the valley seeking legalized refugee status by restricting their travel to other parts of the country.

The local INS office has started requiring a $1,000 bond for Central Americans to have their cases transferred to other immigration courts. The INS says that, without such bonds, too many illegal Central Americans were absconding and never reappearing for their cases. But Fr. de Pasquale points out that few people at Casa Romero have the money to post a bond.

The debate in Brownsville is augmented by another group of migrants to the area, the so-called ``winter Texans'' who arrive in trailers for a few months every year to escape the Northern cold.

Tourism brings more than a quarter-billion dollars into the valley each year and supports about 5,000 jobs, making it one of the area's prime economic forces. Many here fear that a new aliens' shelter could chase away tourists, especially those from the North whose views of illegal aliens are molded more by what they read and hear than by personal experience.

``I think it's mostly our local opposition that has fueled the fears of those who spend their winters here,'' says Hernan Gonzalez, spokesman for the Brownsville Diocese of the Catholic Church. ``I'm not sure they would know otherwise what they're reacting to.''

Two of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against Casa Romero own tourist trailer parks near the proposed site. Their lawyer, Dennis Sanchez, says people are concerned that overcrowding or a ``refugee-camp appearance'' at the new site could prompt the winter Texans to move ``up the valley'' to towns like Mission or McAllen.

``The emotional issues probably concern people more than the legal issues,'' Mr. Sanchez says, ``but of course you can't sue on that basis.'' He believes that much of the fear concerning the proposed shelter could be cleared up if the Brownsville Diocese would promise proper roadways, drainage, and fencing for the facility, and reveal how many people it plans to house there.

Yet the church ``has no specific number in mind'' for the new shelter's capacity, according to the diocese's Mr. Gonzalez, especially as it cannot control demand. But he adds, ``We have learned we can't have an open-door policy.''

In San Benito, the Casa Romero director, Sister Juliana Garcia, puts the shelter's current population at about 100. ``We do not seek them out, but we do not reject them, either,'' she says. ``We are here only to meet their needs.''

She says the flood of Central Americans has slowed to a trickle as the weather has turned cold, and as the Rio Grande has risen. The gossip around the shelter is that the employer sanctions in the new immigration reform law have made jobs harder to come by, and that, too, has slowed arrivals.

In the women's dormitory, a dim, cement-floored room filled with beds and children, women talk as they haggle over a load of donated clothing that has just arrived. One woman from El Salvador says she brought her nine-year-old son north to keep him out of that country's war. Another woman, from Nicaragua, says she and her children are in the US to escape three things: her country's war, religious persecution, and the ``sandinismo,'' meaning the government the Sandinistas have brought to Nicaragua.

When asked, many of the women say they are amazed at the less-than-welcoming reception they have received in this country.

``We are trying only to leave a terrible situation, where there is war and often no food,'' says one Nicaraguan woman, cradling two infants in her arms. ``We thought for that reason we would be accepted here.''


𝗠𝗘𝗘𝗧 & 𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗘𝗧 𝗙𝗥𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗬 𝗔𝗧 𝗧𝗢𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗙𝗜𝗡𝗢~𝗬𝗩𝗢𝗡𝗡𝗘 𝗕𝗔𝗥𝗥𝗔𝗭𝗔 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗖𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗠𝗜𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗘𝗥 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗧 𝟯

 


𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗦 𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗗𝗔 𝗔 "𝗡𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗬 𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗬," 𝗧𝗛𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗦 𝗧𝗢 𝗜𝗠𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗘 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗙𝗦 𝗔𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗟 𝟮

                                         


Donald Trump, who promised an end to the Ukraine War on "Day One," now seems hell-bent on warring with Canada, our nation's closest ally.

While his MAGA worshippers might view Trump's clumsy diplomatic efforts as "playing 3D chess," Canadians seem unimpressed with the bullying tactics and threats.

As someone who grew up along the Canadian border in western Washington, I never dreamed I'd hear an American president refer to Canada as "nasty."

"I deal with every country, indirectly or directly.  One of the nastiest countries to deal with is Canada," Trump said recently.

Referring to outgoing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau demeaningly as "Governor Trudeau," Trump added: "His people are nasty.  They never tell the truth." (Trump's limited vocabulary has him frequently falling back on the word "nasty.")

He continued: "Canada was meant to be the 51st state because we subsidize Canada by $200 billion a year," referencing an exaggerated estimate of the U.S. trade deficit with Canada, which the U.S. Trade Representative's Office placed at $63.3 billion for 2024.

Trump added: "We don't need their lumber, we don't need their energy, we don't need anything. We certainly don't want their automobiles."

                               


Trump has taken aim at a system, which he himself agreed to in 2018 as part of the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement into its successor trade deal, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney wrote on X: "My meeting with the Council on Canada-U.S. Relations was focused on keeping Canada's economy strong in the face of unjust tariffs. We're ready to engage with the U.S. on a comprehensive negotiation—when Canada is shown respect as a sovereign nation."

Adam Chapnick, a professor of defense studies at the Royal Military College of Canada, previously told Newsweek: "Canada and its allies must take the president's threats seriously so as not to allow them to become normalized among his extraordinarily loyal base, but the likelihood of Washington putting serious resources into taking Canada over remains slim to none. I suspect that the president will continue to speak longingly of taking over Canada because it gets such a rise out of Canadians, and he enjoys the attention and the ability to exert power, even if only through unrealistic threats."

Joseph Politano, an economic policy analyst at Apricitas Economics, told The Washington Post: "The last two months have already hurt American businesses and consumers, but the April 2 deadline seriously could make all of that look like a tempest in a teapot. We don't know exactly what they're going to do, but from what they're saying, it sounds functionally like new tariffs on all U.S. imports."


Thursday, March 20, 2025

𝗖𝗔𝗦𝗔 𝗥𝗢𝗠𝗘𝗥𝗢, 𝗔 𝗦𝗔𝗙𝗘 𝗛𝗔𝗩𝗘𝗡 𝗜𝗡 𝗦𝗔𝗡 𝗕𝗘𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗢, 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗟𝗨𝗫 𝗢𝗙 𝗖𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗟 𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗡 𝗥𝗘𝗙𝗨𝗚𝗘𝗘𝗦 𝗙𝗟𝗘𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗪𝗔𝗥-𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗡 𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗘𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗚𝗜𝗡𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗜𝗡 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝟭𝟵𝟴𝟬'𝗦

From the editor:  Below is a photo, submitted by Rene Torres, of the interior of Casa Romero, a safe house in San Benito that provided shelter for Central American refugees in the 1980's.

Also, find an article written in 2018 detailing the mass exodus of refugees fleeing Central America at a time when the U.S., under President Reagan, was fighting the Soviet-backed contras in that region.  



 https://myrgv.com/uncategorized/2018/12/16/1980s-marked-beginning-of-migrant-influx/

https://nacla.org/article/crackdown-sanctuary-underground-railroad-surfaces


RGV.com, HARLINGEN, published 12/16,2018— Migrant families walked north along the highway, a tent city stretched along Ed Carey Drive and a shelter was housing hundreds of immigrants in a San Benito neighborhood.

Nearly 40 years ago, the Rio Grande Valley marked the path of the first mass exodus of Central American migrants to enter the United States.

Today, a caravan of thousands of Central Americans languishes in Tijuana, Mexico, full of hopes of claiming asylum across the border.

The Rev. Michael Seifert and Sister Norma Pimentel, center, with Central American in Casa Oscar Romero in the 1980s. Photo courtesy Catholic Diocese of Brownsville

Sister Julianna Garcia, director of Casa Oscar Romero, outside the shelter in the 1980s. Photo courtesy Catholic Diocese of Brownsville

Sisters Julianna Garcia, director of Casa Oscar Romero, and Central Americans ride a bus in the 1980s. Photo courtesy Catholic Diocese of Brownsville

                                     

The Rev. Michael Seifert and Sister Norma Pimentel, center, with Central American in Casa Oscar Romero in the 1980s, Sister Julianna Garcia, director of Casa Oscar Romero, outside the shelter in the 1980s., Sister Julianna Garcia, director of Casa Oscar Romero, and Central Americans ride a bus in the 1980s , . 

“Nothing’s really changed,” Jonathan Jones, who helped Central Americans fight for asylum in the 1980s, said, referring to Central American migration.

From 1981 to the early 1990s, tens of thousands of migrants from El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua and Guatemala crossed the Rio Grande near Brownsville, many fleeing civil wars.

Now in Tijuana, the Mexican government is sheltering as many as 6,000 migrants, many from Honduras, after journeying hundreds of miles to escape violence in their countries.

“The governments have failed their own people,” Jones said. “These countries are broken economically and politically. These folks are struggling to survive.”

The caravan, which left Honduras in October, led President Donald Trump to order as many as 5,000 troops to the U.S. border.

At one time, the caravan numbered about 7,000 migrants, most traveling on foot toward the U.S. border.

The caravan traces it roots to the 1980s and the mass exodus that would change the face of cities such as Los Angeles, Houston and Miami.

“You have real cataclysmic events in the ‘80s,” said Jones, a former paralegal with Casa de Proyecto Libertad, a human rights group in Harlingen. “The ‘80s were dramatic in terms of numbers. The numbers were pretty steady during the ‘80s and there were increases — surges.”

Central America became the last vestige of the Cold War.

At the time, the United States was supporting Central American militaries fighting Soviet-backed guerrillas then-President Ronald Reagan blamed were behind “all the unrest of the region.”

“A lot of people were fleeing the atrocities of the death squads,” Jones, now an English instructor at South Texas College, said.

In 1981, attorneys Lisa Brodyaga and Thelma Garcia founded Proyecto Libertad to offer legal representation to Central Americans.

“People didn’t have attorneys and the (federal government) didn’t have the numbers to advise them,” Garcia said from her law office.

The unprecedented numbers, she said, made it impossible for attorneys to represent most migrants.

“It was an exodus like you see in a movie,” Garcia said. “There were a lot of people just walking across the Valley trying to catch the train headed north.”

The 1980s Central American exodus led to major changes in the federal government’s migrant detention policy, said Rogelio Nuñez, executive director of Proyecto Libertad.

“Before 1980, you didn’t have a detention issue,” Nuñez said.

Before the influx, the U.S. Border Patrol detained migrants before releasing them with orders to appear in immigration court after arriving at their destination.

But faced with unprecedented numbers, the federal government began ordering migrants to remain in the Valley until they appeared in court.

“The Valley became a zone of detention where people couldn’t leave,” Nuñez said.

At the federal detention center near Bayview, he said, lack of room led officials to set up tents to hold migrants.

By the late 1980s, the government was holding migrants in a tent city off Ed Carey Drive in Harlingen, Nuñez said.

At that time, he said, the government began detaining children who had crossed the border without parents or guardians.

The Central American exodus led private organizations to open federally-funded shelters.

Soon, the government began contracting with nonprofits such as International Education Services, which was headquartered in Los Fresnos, to hold migrant children, Nuñez said.

The 1980s exodus helped lead to steady increases in the numbers of Border Patrol agents along the Southwest border.

In 1980, 2,268 Border Patrol agents worked along the southern border.

By 1986, the government was calling for 22,500 agents by 2010, Nuñez said.

Today, about 18,000 agents are working along the Southwest border.

One of the largest waves of immigration in recent history helped change the face of America.

“The vast majority would go north,” Jones, who serves on Proyecto Libertad’s board of directors, said. “You have huge communities in Houston, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles.”

By the early 1990s, about 20 percent of El Salvador’s population had fled the country.

Of those, about 300,000 settled in Los Angeles.

By 2015, about 3.4 million Central Americans lived in the United States, with 85 percent from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.

Like those who make up the caravan stalled in Tijuana, Central Americans continue journeying to the United States, many claiming they are fleeing widespread gang violence.

This year(2018), the Border Patrol apprehended 107,212 migrants traveling in family groups, up from 75,622 last year.

“There are such great numbers of people,” Sister Norma Pimentel, executive director of Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley, said.

Since 1982, Pimentel has helped shelter migrants after their journeys across the border.

“We provide humane care for them,” she said.

Since 2014, tens of thousands — most from Guatemala — have crossed the border, including many children traveling without parents or guardians.

This year, the Border Patrol apprehended 50,036 so-called “unaccompanied minors,” up from 41,435 last year.

Across the border, the Valley continues to be the migrants’ central pathway to the United States.

In strong and steady numbers, children are apparently making the journey alone.

This year, 23,757 children were detained in the Valley, up from 23,708 last year.

“Now we see more children than ever,” Pimentel said.






Tuesday, March 18, 2025

𝗦𝗜𝗫𝗧𝗬-𝗙𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗬𝗘𝗔𝗥 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗢𝗙 𝗕𝗥𝗢𝗪𝗡𝗦𝗩𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗘 𝗛𝗜𝗚𝗛 𝗦𝗖𝗛𝗢𝗢𝗟 𝗔𝗧𝗛𝗟𝗘𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗦 𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 "𝗔 𝗙𝗟𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧 𝗧𝗢 𝗥𝗘𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗘𝗥" 𝗙𝗘𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗜 𝗡𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗥𝗔

   

                                                   submitted by Rene Torres


          
           
                                                                                  




                                                 

𝗜𝗡 𝗥𝗘𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗥𝗬 𝗕𝗥𝗢𝗪𝗡𝗦𝗩𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗘 𝗛𝗜𝗚𝗛 𝗦𝗖𝗛𝗢𝗢𝗟 𝗤𝗨𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗕𝗔𝗖𝗞, 𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗜 𝗡𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗥𝗔

                                                         


From the editor:  The following comments were posted with Mr. Najera's induction into the Rio Grande Valley Sports Hall of Fame:

Najera is regarded as one of the best quarterbacks ever to play high school football in Brownsville.
Najera played quarterback at Brownsville High School from 1967-69, and was part of a team that was winless in his sophomore year. During the 1969 senior season, Najera led Brownsville to the District 26-4A championship and a 10-2 season record. He was a dual-threat quarterback who passed for 1,300 yards with 19 touchdowns rushed for 1,000 more with 12 TDs in his senior season. Brownsville won a bi-district championship before falling in the region semifinals. He received second-team all-state honors.
Najera and 10 of his teammates from the 1969 team went on to play collegiate football. He received 26 college offers and chose Texas A&I University, where he played two seasons. His combined 333 yards was an individual school record at the time and earned him recognition in the Sports Illustrated “Faces in the Crowd.”